These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27924395)

  • 1. The effect of postoperative complications on survival of patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Li KK; Wang YJ; Liu XH; Tan QY; Jiang YG; Guo W
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3475-3482. PubMed ID: 27924395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term outcomes of 530 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Qi W; Zixiang W; Tianwei Z; Shuai F; Sai Z; Gang S; Ming W
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 117(5):957-969. PubMed ID: 29878389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Propensity-Matched Analysis Comparing Survival After Hybrid Thoracoscopic-Laparotomy Esophagectomy and Complete Thoracoscopic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy.
    Li KK; Wang YJ; Liu XH; Wang RW; Jiang YG; Guo W
    World J Surg; 2019 Mar; 43(3):853-861. PubMed ID: 30386913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Complications in 502 Patients With Surgically Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Single-institution Study.
    Baba Y; Yoshida N; Shigaki H; Iwatsuki M; Miyamoto Y; Sakamoto Y; Watanabe M; Baba H
    Ann Surg; 2016 Aug; 264(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 26670288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
    Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The status of perineural invasion predicts the outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Ning ZH; Zhao W; Li XD; Chen LJ; Xu B; Gu WD; Shao YJ; Xu Y; Huang J; Pei HL; Jiang JT
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2015; 8(6):6881-90. PubMed ID: 26261575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic Significance of Postoperative Complications After Curative Resection for Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Saeki H; Tsutsumi S; Tajiri H; Yukaya T; Tsutsumi R; Nishimura S; Nakaji Y; Kudou K; Akiyama S; Kasagi Y; Nakanishi R; Nakashima Y; Sugiyama M; Ohgaki K; Sonoda H; Oki E; Maehara Y
    Ann Surg; 2017 Mar; 265(3):527-533. PubMed ID: 28169928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraoperative conversion does not affect the oncological outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal cancer.
    Liu XH; Hu Y; Li KK; Wang YJ; Jiang YG; Guo W
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4517-4526. PubMed ID: 29766306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of single- and multi-incision minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for treating esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched study.
    Lee JM; Chen SC; Yang SM; Tseng YF; Yang PW; Huang PM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2925-2931. PubMed ID: 27826778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
    BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Invasive
    Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer.
    Huang HT; Wang F; Shen L; Xia CQ; Lu CX; Zhong CJ
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 13():310. PubMed ID: 26542373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The survival impact of postoperative complications after curative resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: propensity score-matching analysis.
    Yamamoto M; Shimokawa M; Yoshida D; Yamaguchi S; Ohta M; Egashira A; Ikebe M; Morita M; Toh Y
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 146(5):1351-1360. PubMed ID: 32185488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Mitzman B; Lutfi W; Wang CH; Krantz S; Howington JA; Kim KW
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 28823338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the 7th edition of the TNM classification in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Wang J; Wu N; Zheng QF; Yan S; Lv C; Li SL; Yang Y
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(48):18397-403. PubMed ID: 25561808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Esophagectomy using a thoracoscopic approach with an open laparotomic or hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal stage for esophageal cancer: analysis of survival and prognostic factors in 315 patients.
    Ichikawa H; Miyata G; Miyazaki S; Onodera K; Kamei T; Hoshida T; Kikuchi H; Kanba R; Nakano T; Akaishi T; Satomi S
    Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):873-85. PubMed ID: 23001081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.