These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27924440)

  • 1. Is pupillary response a reliable index of word recognition? Evidence from a delayed lexical decision task.
    Haro J; Guasch M; Vallès B; Ferré P
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1930-1938. PubMed ID: 27924440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence.
    Kuchinke L; Võ ML; Hofmann M; Jacobs AM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17532075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision-related factors in pupil old/new effects: Attention, response execution, and false memory.
    Brocher A; Graf T
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():124-134. PubMed ID: 28624522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An fMRI investigation of strategies for word recognition.
    Edwards JD; Pexman PM; Goodyear BG; Chambers CG
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):648-62. PubMed ID: 15893458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.
    Lété B; Bonin P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):973-1000. PubMed ID: 23030693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lexical access versus lexical decision processes for auditory, visual, and audiovisual items: Insights from behavioral and neural measures.
    López Zunini RA; Baart M; Samuel AG; Armstrong BC
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107305. PubMed ID: 31838100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eyes wide open: Pupil size as a proxy for inhibition in the masked-priming paradigm.
    Geller J; Still ML; Morris AL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):554-64. PubMed ID: 26631160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 11958353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pupil dilation during recognition memory: Isolating unexpected recognition from judgment uncertainty.
    Mill RD; O'Connor AR; Dobbins IG
    Cognition; 2016 Sep; 154():81-94. PubMed ID: 27253862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between reading ability and lateralized lexical decision.
    Weems SA; Zaidel E
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):507-15. PubMed ID: 15223197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?
    Mädebach A; Oppermann F; Hantsch A; Curda C; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):522-38. PubMed ID: 21299323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The time-course of lexical activation in Japanese morphographic word recognition: evidence for a character-driven processing model.
    Miwa K; Libben G; Dijkstra T; Baayen H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):79-113. PubMed ID: 23713954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Serial and parallel processing in reading: investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition.
    Dare N; Shillcock R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):487-504. PubMed ID: 22950804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: typicality effects and orthographic correlates.
    Arciuli J; Cupples L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):920-48. PubMed ID: 16608755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Syllable transposition effects in korean word recognition.
    Lee CH; Kwon Y; Kim K; Rastle K
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Jun; 44(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 25694048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect.
    Sereno SC; O'Donnell PJ; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 16634674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emotional words impact the mind but not the body: evidence from pupillary responses.
    Bayer M; Sommer W; Schacht A
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Nov; 48(11):1554-1562. PubMed ID: 21592139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.