440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27925679)
1. Value of Shear Wave Elastography Versus Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Superficial Lymphadenopathy Unexplained by Conventional Sonography.
Tan S; Miao LY; Cui LG; Sun PF; Qian LX
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):189-199. PubMed ID: 27925679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shear Wave Elastography in Head and Neck Lymph Node Assessment: Image Quality and Diagnostic Impact Compared with B-Mode and Doppler Ultrasonography.
Desmots F; Fakhry N; Mancini J; Reyre A; Vidal V; Jacquier A; Santini L; Moulin G; Varoquaux A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 26617244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of multimodal ultrasonography for differentiating benign and malignant cervical lymphadenopathy.
Yang JR; Song Y; Jia YL; Ruan LT
Jpn J Radiol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):938-945. PubMed ID: 33970452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Nodes: A Comparative Study With B-mode and Color Doppler Sonography.
Acu L; Oktar SÖ; Acu R; Yücel C; Cebeci S
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2491-2499. PubMed ID: 27794132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification Shear Wave Elastography: Prospective Assessment of Cervical Lymph Nodes.
Cheng KL; Choi YJ; Shim WH; Lee JH; Baek JH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 26553206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of quantitative shear wave elastography in differentiating the cervical lymph nodes in patients with thyroid nodules.
You J; Chen J; Xiang F; Song Y; Khamis S; Lu C; Lv Q; Zhang Y; Xie M
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2018 Apr; 45(2):251-259. PubMed ID: 28905143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of metastatic cervical lymph nodes.
Choi YJ; Lee JH; Lim HK; Kim SY; Han MW; Cho KJ; Baek JH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 39(6):935-40. PubMed ID: 23453381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Value of Arrival Time Parametric Imaging Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Superficial Enlarged Lymph Nodes.
Yin SS; Cui QL; Fan ZH; Yang W; Yan K
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 May; 38(5):1287-1298. PubMed ID: 30208240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of B-Mode Ultrasonography and Shear Wave Elastography in Cervical Lymph Nodes.
Kang HJ; Seo M; Sohn YM; Yun SJ; Min SY; You MW; Yeon EK
Ultrasound Q; 2019 Sep; 35(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 31283566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical application of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of superficial lymphadenopathy.
Yu M; Liu Q; Song HP; Han ZH; Su HL; He GB; Zhou XD
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 May; 29(5):735-40. PubMed ID: 20427785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary Evaluation of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification for Differential Diagnosis of Metastatic and Nonmetastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes.
Zhao Y; Xi J; Zhao B; Xiong W; Jiang D; Yang L; Cai Z; Liu T; Jiang H; Rong S; Jin X
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Mar; 36(3):557-563. PubMed ID: 28127781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography in the Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Carcinoma: A Monocentric Study.
Agliata G; Valeri G; Argalia G; Tarabelli E; Giuseppetti GM
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Mar; 36(3):505-511. PubMed ID: 28098400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of CEUS in characterization of superficial lymph nodes: a single center prospective study.
de Stefano G; Scognamiglio U; Di Martino F; Parrella R; Scarano F; Signoriello G; Farella N
Oncotarget; 2016 Aug; 7(32):52416-52422. PubMed ID: 27191746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus shear wave elastography in differentiating benign and malignant superficial lymph node lesions.
Cai H; Liu S
Am J Transl Res; 2021; 13(10):11625-11631. PubMed ID: 34786088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The place of CEUS in distinguishing benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes: a prospective study.
Poanta L; Serban O; Pascu I; Pop S; Cosgarea M; Fodor D
Med Ultrason; 2014 Mar; 16(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 24567918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of shear wave elastography in predicting for undiagnosed small cervical lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A preliminary study.
Chen BB; Li J; Guan Y; Xiao WW; Zhao C; Lu TX; Han F
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 103():19-24. PubMed ID: 29803380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does ultrasound contrast agent improve the diagnostic value of colour and power Doppler sonography in superficial lymph node enlargement?
Schulte-Altedorneburg G; Demharter J; Linné R; Droste DW; Bohndorf K; Bücklein W
Eur J Radiol; 2003 Dec; 48(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 14652142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual touch tissue imaging quantification shear wave elastography for determining benign versus malignant cervical lymph nodes: a comparison with conventional ultrasound.
Kılıç A; Çolakoğlu Er H
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2019 Mar; 25(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 30774094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced sonography and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in solid liver lesions.
Zhang P; Zhou P; Tian SM; Qian Y; Li JL; Li RZ
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Feb; 33(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 24449722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis.
Choi MY; Lee JW; Jang KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):981-4. PubMed ID: 7677005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
