These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27925721)

  • 1. Schur Complement Inequalities for Covariance Matrices and Monogamy of Quantum Correlations.
    Lami L; Hirche C; Adesso G; Winter A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Nov; 117(22):220502. PubMed ID: 27925721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring Gaussian quantum information and correlations using the Rényi entropy of order 2.
    Adesso G; Girolami D; Serafini A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Nov; 109(19):190502. PubMed ID: 23215368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Demonstration of Monogamy Relations for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering in Gaussian Cluster States.
    Deng X; Xiang Y; Tian C; Adesso G; He Q; Gong Q; Su X; Xie C; Peng K
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Jun; 118(23):230501. PubMed ID: 28644631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monogamy equalities for qubit entanglement from Lorentz invariance.
    Eltschka C; Siewert J
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Apr; 114(14):140402. PubMed ID: 25910095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Entanglement of formation and monogamy of multi-party quantum entanglement.
    Kim JS
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2364. PubMed ID: 33504945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strong monogamy of bipartite and genuine multipartite entanglement: the Gaussian case.
    Adesso G; Illuminati F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Oct; 99(15):150501. PubMed ID: 17995148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are general quantum correlations monogamous?
    Streltsov A; Adesso G; Piani M; Bruss D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Aug; 109(5):050503. PubMed ID: 23006154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sharpening the second law of thermodynamics with the quantum Bayes theorem.
    Gharibyan H; Tegmark M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Sep; 90(3):032125. PubMed ID: 25314413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantum steering of Gaussian states via non-Gaussian measurements.
    Ji SW; Lee J; Park J; Nha H
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jul; 6():29729. PubMed ID: 27411853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anisotropic Invariance and the Distribution of Quantum Correlations.
    Cheng S; Hall MJ
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Jan; 118(1):010401. PubMed ID: 28106404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monogamy inequality for distributed gaussian entanglement.
    Hiroshima T; Adesso G; Illuminati F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Feb; 98(5):050503. PubMed ID: 17358836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Steering Witness and Steering Criterion of Gaussian States.
    Ma R; Yan T; Wu D; Qi X
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Dec; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 35052089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hierarchy of Steering Criteria Based on Moments for All Bipartite Quantum Systems.
    Kogias I; Skrzypczyk P; Cavalcanti D; Acín A; Adesso G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Nov; 115(21):210401. PubMed ID: 26636832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of Gaussian quantum steering.
    Kogias I; Lee AR; Ragy S; Adesso G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Feb; 114(6):060403. PubMed ID: 25723193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterizations of matrix and operator-valued Φ-entropies, and operator Efron-Stein inequalities.
    Cheng HC; Hsieh MH
    Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2016 Mar; 472(2187):20150563. PubMed ID: 27118909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should Entanglement Measures be Monogamous or Faithful?
    Lancien C; Di Martino S; Huber M; Piani M; Adesso G; Winter A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Aug; 117(6):060501. PubMed ID: 27541447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Entanglement monogamy in three qutrit systems.
    Li Q; Cui J; Wang S; Long GL
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):1946. PubMed ID: 28512296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random pure states: Quantifying bipartite entanglement beyond the linear statistics.
    Vivo P; Pato MP; Oshanin G
    Phys Rev E; 2016 May; 93(5):052106. PubMed ID: 27300829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strong monogamy conjecture for multiqubit entanglement: the four-qubit case.
    Regula B; Di Martino S; Lee S; Adesso G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(11):110501. PubMed ID: 25259963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. General monogamy relation for the entanglement of formation in multiqubit systems.
    Bai YK; Xu YF; Wang ZD
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(10):100503. PubMed ID: 25238341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.