These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27927021)
1. Cost Analysis of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction. Jacobs BL; Seelam R; Lai JC; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 27927021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variation in the Use of Open Pyeloplasty, Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty, and Endopyelotomy for the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults. Jacobs BL; Lai JC; Seelam R; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 27936909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction. Jacobs BL; Lai JC; Seelam R; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS; Urology; 2018 Jan; 111():72-77. PubMed ID: 28943371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in the treatment of adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Jacobs BL; Kaufman SR; Morgenstern H; Hollenbeck BK; Wolf JS; Hollingsworth JM J Endourol; 2013 Mar; 27(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 22967009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Equivocal ureteropelvic junction obstruction on diuretic renogram--should minimally invasive pyeloplasty be offered to symptomatic patients? Ozayar A; Friedlander JI; Shakir NA; Gahan JC; Cadeddu JA; Morgan MS J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1278-82. PubMed ID: 25444983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade. Yanke BV; Lallas CD; Pagnani C; McGinnis DE; Bagley DH J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1397-402. PubMed ID: 18707717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty. Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases. Umari P; Lissiani A; Trombetta C; Belgrano E Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of percutaneous endopyelotomy with open pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Schenkman EM; Tarry WF J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):1013-5. PubMed ID: 9474220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Practice trends in contemporary management of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Marcovich R; Jacobson AI; Aldana JP; Lee BR; Smith AD Urology; 2003 Jul; 62(1):22-5; discussion 25-6. PubMed ID: 12837413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015. Varda BK; Wang Y; Chung BI; Lee RS; Kurtz MP; Nelson CP; Chang SL J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Aug; 14(4):336.e1-336.e8. PubMed ID: 29530407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]