These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

887 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27927246)

  • 41. [Adaption of surgical procedure in the treatment of submucosal esophageal cancer].
    Hao S; Li Z; Fang W; Mao T; Zhao H; Zhong C
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 18(9):885-8. PubMed ID: 26404683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: Single Center Experience after 44 Consecutive Cases.
    Bjelović M; Babič T; Gunjić D; Veselinović M; Špica B
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(7-8):410-5. PubMed ID: 26506750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
    Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
    Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparing Perioperative Mortality and Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis.
    Sakamoto T; Fujiogi M; Matsui H; Fushimi K; Yasunaga H
    Ann Surg; 2021 Aug; 274(2):324-330. PubMed ID: 31356263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: the ROMIO (Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) feasibility study and pilot trial.
    Metcalfe C; Avery K; Berrisford R; Barham P; Noble SM; Fernandez AM; Hanna G; Goldin R; Elliott J; Wheatley T; Sanders G; Hollowood A; Falk S; Titcomb D; Streets C; Donovan JL; Blazeby JM
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Jun; 20(48):1-68. PubMed ID: 27373720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Yanasoot A; Yolsuriyanwong K; Ruangsin S; Laohawiriyakamol S; Sunpaweravong S
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2017; 25(7-8):513-517. PubMed ID: 28871799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhou C; Ma G; Li X; Li J; Yan Y; Liu P; He J; Ren Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 13():269. PubMed ID: 26338060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Single center consecutive series cohort study of minimally invasive versus open resection for cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.
    Klevebro F; Scandavini CM; Kamiya S; Nilsson M; Lundell L; Rouvelas I
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 29897443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.
    Nagpal K; Ahmed K; Vats A; Yakoub D; James D; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Moorthy K; Athanasiou T
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1621-9. PubMed ID: 20108155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Weksler B; Sharma P; Moudgill N; Chojnacki KA; Rosato EL
    Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 21899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on esophagectomies in esophageal cancer: The superiority of minimally invasive surgery.
    Szakó L; Németh D; Farkas N; Kiss S; Dömötör RZ; Engh MA; Hegyi P; Eross B; Papp A
    World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Aug; 28(30):4201-4210. PubMed ID: 36157121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
    Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Postoperative short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Akhtar NM; Chen D; Zhao Y; Dane D; Xue Y; Wang W; Zhang J; Sang Y; Chen C; Chen Y
    Thorac Cancer; 2020 Jun; 11(6):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 32310341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus thoracoscopic approach: multi-institutional study on short-term outcomes.
    Chao YK; Lee JY; Huang WC; Lee JM; Tseng YL; Lu HI
    BJS Open; 2024 Jul; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 39041732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Matched-pair comparisons of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
    Wang W; Liu F; Hu T; Wang C
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(28):e11447. PubMed ID: 29995799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Improved Functional Results After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Intrathoracic Versus Cervical Anastomosis.
    van Workum F; van der Maas J; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Luyer MD; Rosman C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 103(1):267-273. PubMed ID: 27677565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Early outcomes with robot-assisted vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of matched studies.
    Huang Y; Zhao YL; Song JD
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2021 Dec; 25(24):7887-7897. PubMed ID: 34982451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Jin Z; Zhu K; Sun J; Zhang J; Zhang B
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 18(1):90. PubMed ID: 36945008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial.
    Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Cuesta MA; Daams F; Roig Garcia J; Bonavina L; Rosman C; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
    Ann Surg; 2017 Aug; 266(2):232-236. PubMed ID: 28187044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.