These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27927426)

  • 21. Impact of unoperated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in adulthood: a 10-year analysis.
    Erwin J; Carlson BB; Bunch J; Jackson RS; Burton D
    Spine Deform; 2020 Oct; 8(5):1009-1016. PubMed ID: 32468383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Convergent validity, ceiling, and floor effects of the English-ISYQOL against established quality of life questionnaires (SRS-22r and SAQ) and curve angles in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
    Alanazi MH; Parent EC; Bettany-Saltikov J; Hill D; Southon S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 Jun; 280():225-230. PubMed ID: 34190091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relevant impact of surgery on quality of life for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : a registry-based two-year follow-up cohort study.
    Mens RH; Bisseling P; de Kleuver M; van Hooff ML
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Feb; 104-B(2):265-273. PubMed ID: 35094577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aspects of Patient Experience Associated With Improved Scoliosis Research Society-22 Revised (SRS-22R) and European Quality of Life Five-Dimension Five-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Managed With Observation or Bracing.
    Chua YL; Toh AJN; Tan XYB; Pan DCY; Lee NKL; Lim KBL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 May; 48(9):617-624. PubMed ID: 36716381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Subjective perception of spinal deformity after selective versus non-selective fusion of Lenke 1C curves.
    Bizzoca D; Piazzolla A; Solarino G; Moretti L; Moretti B
    Spine Deform; 2022 Jul; 10(4):855-863. PubMed ID: 35133641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Young Patients' Satisfaction Following the Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Alzayed ZS; Majid OB; Alqahtani SA; Saba I; Al Rushud MA; Eissa AT
    Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30058. PubMed ID: 36381902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. SRS22R Appearance Domain Correlates Most With Patient Satisfaction After Adult Deformity Surgery to the Sacrum at 5-year Follow-up.
    Gum JL; Bridwell KH; Lenke LG; Bumpass DB; Sugrue PA; Karikari IO; Carreon LY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Aug; 40(16):1297-302. PubMed ID: 25943086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reliability and concurrent validity of the adapted Greek version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22r Questionnaire. A cross-sectional study performed on conservatively treated patients.
    Potoupnis M; Papavasiliou K; Kenanidis E; Pellios S; Kapetanou A; Sayegh F; Kapetanos G
    Hippokratia; 2012 Jul; 16(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 23935288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Importance of achieving Scoliosis Research Society-22r minimal clinically important difference for improving patient satisfaction after adult spinal deformity surgery.
    Arima H; Hasegawa T; Yamato Y; Yoshida G; Banno T; Oe S; Mihara Y; Ushirozako H; Yamada T; Watanabe Y; Ide K; Nakai K; Kurosu K; Matsuyama Y
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Oct; 35(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 34298504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality of Life Improvement Following Surgery in Adolescent Spinal Deformity Patients: A Comparison Between Scheuermann Kyphosis and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
    Toombs C; Lonner B; Shah S; Samdani A; Cahill P; Shufflebarger H; Yaszay B; Sponseller P; Newton P
    Spine Deform; 2018; 6(6):676-683. PubMed ID: 30348343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cultural Variations in the Minimum Clinically Important Difference Thresholds for SRS-22R After Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.
    Arima H; Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Yamato Y; Hasegawa T; Togawa D; Kobayashi S; Yoshida G; Yasuda T; Banno T; Oe S; Mihara Y; Ushirozako H; Matsuyama Y
    Spine Deform; 2019 Jul; 7(4):627-632. PubMed ID: 31202381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Associations between curve severity and revised Scoliosis Research Society-22 and scoliosis Japanese Questionnaire-27 scores in female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter, cross-sectional study.
    Doi T; Watanabe K; Doi T; Inoue H; Sugawara R; Arai Y; Shirado O; Yamazaki K; Uno K; Yanagida H; Kato S; Taniguchi Y; Matsubayashi Y; Oshima Y; Tanaka S; Takeshita K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Mar; 22(1):312. PubMed ID: 33781247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Body Image Disturbance Improvement After Operative Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
    Lonner BS; Brochin R; Lewis R; Vig KS; Kassin G; Castillo A; Ren Y
    Spine Deform; 2019 Sep; 7(5):741-745. PubMed ID: 31495474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with normal controls: a review and statistical analysis of the literature.
    Rushton PR; Grevitt MP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(9):778-85. PubMed ID: 23169069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Legacy Patient-reported Outcome Measures Can Be Reliably Translated to PROMIS Domains for Use in Adolescent Spinal Deformity.
    Yau A; Heath MR; Nguyen JT; Fabricant PD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Dec; 46(23):E1254-E1261. PubMed ID: 33907079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients report increased pain at five years compared with two years after surgical treatment.
    Upasani VV; Caltoum C; Petcharaporn M; Bastrom TP; Pawelek JB; Betz RR; Clements DH; Lenke LG; Lowe TG; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):1107-12. PubMed ID: 18449045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Concurrent validity of the Brazilian version of SRS-22r with Br-SF-36.
    Rosanova GC; Gabriel BS; Camarini PM; Gianini PE; Coelho DM; Oliveira AS
    Rev Bras Fisioter; 2010; 14(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 20464160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age variation in the minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22r after surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity - A single institution analysis in Japan.
    Arima H; Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Yamato Y; Hasegawa T; Togawa D; Kobayashi S; Yoshida G; Yasuda T; Banno T; Oe S; Mihara Y; Matsuyama Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2018 Jan; 23(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 28988878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Content validity of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22r): A qualitative concept elicitation study.
    Alamrani S; Gardner A; Falla D; Russell E; Rushton AB; Heneghan NR
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285538. PubMed ID: 37146069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surgery for the Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients After Skeletal Maturity: Early Versus Late Surgery.
    Lonner BS; Ren Y; Bess S; Kelly M; Kim HJ; Yaszay B; Lafage V; Marks M; Miyanji F; Shaffrey CI; Newton PO
    Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 30587326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.