282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27928753)
1. Comparison of in vitro test systems using bacterial and mammalian cells for genotoxicity assessment within the "health-related indication value (HRIV) concept.
Prantl EM; Kramer M; Schmidt CK; Knauer M; Gartiser S; Shuliakevich A; Milas J; Glatt H; Meinl W; Hollert H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(5):3996-4010. PubMed ID: 27928753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health related guide values for drinking-water since 1993 as guidance to assess presence of new analytes in drinking-water.
Dieter HH
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2014 Mar; 217(2-3):117-32. PubMed ID: 23820379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relevance of "non-relevant metabolites" from plant protection products (PPPs) for drinking water: the German view.
Dieter HH
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 19706317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A hierarchical testing strategy for micropollutants in drinking water regarding their potential endocrine-disrupting effects-towards health-related indicator values.
Kuckelkorn J; Redelstein R; Heide T; Kunze J; Maletz S; Waldmann P; Grummt T; Seiler TB; Hollert H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(5):4051-4065. PubMed ID: 28936609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of genotoxic effects of surface waters using a battery of bioassays indicating different mode of action.
Han Y; Li N; Oda Y; Ma M; Rao K; Wang Z; Jin W; Hong G; Li Z; Luo Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2016 Nov; 133():448-56. PubMed ID: 27517142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genotoxicity assessment of ethylenediamine dinitrate (EDDN) and diethylenetriamine trinitrate (DETN).
Reddy G; Song J; Kirby P; Johnson MS
Mutat Res; 2011 Dec; 726(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 21944905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays for the rapid assessment of genotoxicity in the early research phase of drug development.
Westerink WM; Stevenson JC; Lauwers A; Griffioen G; Horbach GJ; Schoonen WG
Mutat Res; 2009 May; 676(1-2):113-30. PubMed ID: 19393335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro genotoxicity of polychlorinated butadienes (Cl4-Cl6).
Brüschweiler BJ; Märki W; Wülser R
Mutat Res; 2010 Jun; 699(1-2):47-54. PubMed ID: 20417308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Completely automated short-term genotoxicity testing for the assessment of chemicals and characterisation of contaminated soils and waste waters.
Brinkmann C; Eisentraeger A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 May; 15(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 18504839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genotoxicity evaluation of Hwanglyeonhaedok-tang, an herbal formula.
Jin SE; Lee MY; Seo CS; Ha H; Kim JY; Shin HK
J Ethnopharmacol; 2017 Apr; 202():122-126. PubMed ID: 27916588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genotoxicity evaluation of water soil leachates by Ames test, comet assay, and preliminary Tradescantia micronucleus assay.
Lah B; Vidic T; Glasencnik E; Cepeljnik T; Gorjanc G; Marinsek-Logar R
Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Apr; 139(1-3):107-18. PubMed ID: 17566864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of the alkaline comet assay for industrial genotoxicity screening: comparative investigation with the micronucleus test.
Hartmann A; Elhajouji A; Kiskinis E; Poetter F; Martus H; Fjällman A; Frieauff W; Suter W
Food Chem Toxicol; 2001 Aug; 39(8):843-58. PubMed ID: 11434992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cell-based genotoxicity testing : genetically modified and genetically engineered bacteria in environmental genotoxicology.
Reifferscheid G; Buchinger S
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2010; 118():85-111. PubMed ID: 19543703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro toxicological assessment of an organosulfur compound from Allium extract: Cytotoxicity, mutagenicity and genotoxicity studies.
Mellado-García P; Maisanaba S; Puerto M; Prieto AI; Marcos R; Pichardo S; Cameán AM
Food Chem Toxicol; 2017 Jan; 99():231-240. PubMed ID: 27939830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. From the Cover: An Investigation of the Genotoxicity and Interference of Gold Nanoparticles in Commonly Used In Vitro Mutagenicity and Genotoxicity Assays.
George JM; Magogotya M; Vetten MA; Buys AV; Gulumian M
Toxicol Sci; 2017 Mar; 156(1):149-166. PubMed ID: 28108664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Silver nanoparticles: correlating nanoparticle size and cellular uptake with genotoxicity.
Butler KS; Peeler DJ; Casey BJ; Dair BJ; Elespuru RK
Mutagenesis; 2015 Jul; 30(4):577-91. PubMed ID: 25964273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
