147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27928864)
1. Vaginal misoprostol and cervical ripening balloon for induction of labor in late-term pregnancies.
Duro Gómez J; Garrido Oyarzún MF; Rodríguez Marín AB; de la Torre González AJ; Arjona Berral JE; Castelo-Branco C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Jan; 43(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 27928864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intravaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women: A Double-blinded, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
Zhang Y; Zhu HP; Fan JX; Yu H; Sun LZ; Chen L; Chang Q; Zhao NQ; Di W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Oct; 128(20):2736-42. PubMed ID: 26481739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Timing of sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol for induction of labor.
Kehl S; Böhm L; Weiss C; Heimrich J; Dammer U; Baier F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Faschingbauer F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1495-1501. PubMed ID: 27642010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in pregnancies with oligohydramnios.
Dede FS; Haberal A; Dede H; Sivaslioglu A; Arslanpence I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2004; 57(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 14707473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Cook vaginal cervical ripening balloon with prostaglandin E2 insert for induction of labor in late pregnancy.
Wang L; Wang G; Cao W; Guo L; Hu H; Li Y; Zhang Q
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Sep; 302(3):579-584. PubMed ID: 32617665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management.
Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Gelisen O; Dilbaz B; Ozturk N; Haberal A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15598298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 25 µg sublingual and 50 µg intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor: a randomized controlled equivalence trial.
Sharami SH; Milani F; Faraji R; Bloukimoghadam K; Salamat F; Momenzadeh S; Ebrahimi H
Arch Iran Med; 2014 Oct; 17(10):652-6. PubMed ID: 25305762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
Katz VL; Farmer RM; Dean CA; Carpenter ME
South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 11005347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Diro M; Adra A; Gilles JM; Nassar A; Rodriguez A; Salamat SM; Beydoun SN; O'Sullivan MJ; Yasin SY; Burkett G
J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 10338065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol vs transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS).
Alkmark M; Carlsson Y; Wendel SB; Elden H; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Saltvedt S; Sengpiel V; Wessberg A; Wikström AK; Hagberg H; Wennerholm UB
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Aug; 100(8):1463-1477. PubMed ID: 33768520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Foley catheter vs prostaglandin as ripening agent in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes.
Mackeen AD; Walker L; Ruhstaller K; Schuster M; Sciscione A
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Sep; 114(9):686-92. PubMed ID: 25170038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study.
Marsdal KE; Sørbye IK; Gaudernack LC; Lukasse M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29304769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study.
Kehl S; Weiss C; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Beckmann MW; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Sep; 204():78-82. PubMed ID: 27525685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term.
Aghideh FK; Mullin PM; Ingles S; Ouzounian JG; Opper N; Wilson ML; Miller DA; Lee RH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Apr; 27(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 23919802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Misoprostol with balloon vs oxytocin with balloon in high-risk pregnancy induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Al-Hafez L; Khanuja K; Mendez-Figueroa H; Al-Kouatly HB; Mascio DD; Chauhan SP; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Dec; 5(12):101175. PubMed ID: 37806650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
