156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2792902)
1. Flow cytometric measurements of DNA index and S-phase on paraffin-embedded early stage endometrial cancer: an important prognostic indicator.
Rosenberg P; Wingren S; Simonsen E; Stàl O; Risberg B; Nordenskjöld B
Gynecol Oncol; 1989 Oct; 35(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 2792902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: A clinicopathologic, DNA flow cytometric, p53, and mdm-2 analysis of 49 cases.
Blom R; Guerrieri C; Stâl O; Malmström H; Simonsen E
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Jan; 68(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 9454661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flow cytometric analysis of uterine sarcoma: ploidy and S-phase rate as prognostic indicators.
Malmström H; Schmidt H; Persson PG; Carstensen J; Nordenskjöld B; Simonsen E
Gynecol Oncol; 1992 Feb; 44(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 1544595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA ploidy, morphometry, and nuclear grade as prognostic factors in endometrial carcinoma.
Sorbe B; Risberg B; Frankendal B
Gynecol Oncol; 1990 Jul; 38(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 2354822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flow cytometry and interactive image cytometry in endometrial carcinoma. A comparative and prognostic study.
Strang P; Stenkvist B; Bergström R; Stendahl U; Valdes del Campo M; Tribukait B
Anticancer Res; 1991; 11(2):783-8. PubMed ID: 2064334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cell proliferation, measured as flow cytometric S-phase fraction, is a strong prognostic indicator in FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: a population-based study.
Green RW; Engblom S; Baldetorp B; Hartman L; Måsbäck A; Bjurberg M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Oct; 94(10):1064-73. PubMed ID: 26123703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA ploidy in endometrial carcinoma: major objective prognostic factor.
Britton LC; Wilson TO; Gaffey TA; Cha SS; Wieand HS; Podratz KC
Mayo Clin Proc; 1990 May; 65(5):643-50. PubMed ID: 2348728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA ploidy analysis of endometrial adenocarcinoma using a flow cytometry from paraffin-embedded tissues.
Takahashi Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Oct; 42(10):1339-44. PubMed ID: 1700035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The prognostic significance of stage, tumor size, cellular atypia and DNA ploidy in uterine leiomyosarcoma.
Nordal RR; Kristensen GB; Kaern J; Stenwig AE; Pettersen EO; Tropé CG
Acta Oncol; 1995; 34(6):797-802. PubMed ID: 7576748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of stage I endometrial carcinoma.
Britton LC; Wilson TO; Gaffey TA; Lieber MM; Wieand HS; Podratz KC
Gynecol Oncol; 1989 Sep; 34(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 2767522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Prognostic significance of cell kinetic parameters of endometrial cancer].
Kühn W; Kaufmann M; Feichter GE; Rummel HH; Abel U; Heep J; von Minckwitz G
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 Sep; 49(9):787-92. PubMed ID: 2806852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective analysis of DNA ploidy, proliferative index and epidermal growth factor receptor as prognostic factors for pretreated uterine cancer.
Nagai N; Oshita T; Fujii T; Kioka H; Katsube Y; Ohama K
Oncol Rep; 2000; 7(3):551-9. PubMed ID: 10767367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA ploidy, proliferation index, grade, and stage as prognostic factors for vulvar squamous cell carcinomas.
Dolan JR; McCall AR; Gooneratne S; Walter S; Lansky DM
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Feb; 48(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 8428696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Flow cytometric evaluation of DNA ploidy pattern in uterine cancer].
Watanabe T; Izumi S; Yamaoka K; Tsutsui F; Nozawa S
Nihon Rinsho; 1992 Oct; 50(10):2432-8. PubMed ID: 1447814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Malignant mixed Müllerian tumors of the uterus: a clinicopathologic, DNA flow cytometric, p53, and mdm-2 analysis of 44 cases.
Blom R; Guerrieri C; Stâl O; Malmström H; Sullivan S; Simonsen E
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Jan; 68(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9454654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction, and P-glycoprotein expression in colorectal cancer.
Salud A; Porcel JM; Raikundalia B; Camplejohn RS; Taub NA
J Surg Oncol; 1999 Nov; 72(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 10562364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow cytometric deoxyribonucleic acid index: a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma.
Iversen OE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Oct; 155(4):770-6. PubMed ID: 3766632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative prognostic significance of DNA flow cytometry and histologic grading in endometrial carcinoma.
Quillamor RM; Furlong JW; Hoschner JA; Wynn RM
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1988; 26(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 3229666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA flow cytometry, clinical and morphological parameters as prognostic factors for advanced malignant and borderline ovarian tumors.
Kühn W; Kaufmann M; Feichter GE; Rummel HH; Schmid H; Heberling D
Gynecol Oncol; 1989 Jun; 33(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 2722063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flow cytometry in invasive endometrial carcinoma. Correlations between DNA content S-phase rate and clinical parameters.
Stendahl U; Wagenius G; Strang P; Tribukait B
In Vivo; 1988; 2(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 2979827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
