102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27929480)
1. On correlations in IMRT planning aims.
Roy A; Das IJ; Nohadani O
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):44-59. PubMed ID: 27929480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dependence of achievable plan quality on treatment technique and planning goal refinement: a head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy application.
Qi XS; Ruan D; Lee SP; Pham A; Kupelian P; Low DA; Steinberg M; Demarco J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 25752396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans.
Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
Wu B; Ricchetti F; Sanguineti G; Kazhdan M; Simari P; Jacques R; Taylor R; McNutt T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Mar; 79(4):1241-7. PubMed ID: 20800382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic interactive optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.
Tol JP; Dahele M; Peltola J; Nord J; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():75. PubMed ID: 25885689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dosimetric evaluation of knowledge-based VMAT planning with simultaneous integrated boosting for rectal cancer patients.
Wu H; Jiang F; Yue H; Li S; Zhang Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):78-85. PubMed ID: 27929483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using overlap volume histogram and IMRT plan data to guide and automate VMAT planning: a head-and-neck case study.
Wu B; Pang D; Simari P; Taylor R; Sanguineti G; McNutt T
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021714. PubMed ID: 23387737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
Moore KL; Brame RS; Low DA; Mutic S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Oct; 81(2):545-51. PubMed ID: 21277097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protons offer reduced normal-tissue exposure for patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy for resected pancreatic head cancer.
Nichols RC; Huh SN; Prado KL; Yi BY; Sharma NK; Ho MW; Hoppe BS; Mendenhall NP; Li Z; Regine WF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 22245197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative planning study of step-and-shoot IMRT versus helical tomotherapy for whole-pelvis irradiation in cervical cancer.
Chitapanarux I; Tharavichitkul E; Nobnop W; Wanwilairat S; Vongtama R; Traisathit P
J Radiat Res; 2015 May; 56(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 25720771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric verification of surface and superficial doses for head and neck IMRT with different PTV shrinkage margins.
Shiau AC; Lai PL; Liang JA; Shueng PW; Chen WL; Kuan WP
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1435-43. PubMed ID: 21520855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of an automated knowledge based treatment planning system for head and neck.
Krayenbuehl J; Norton I; Studer G; Guckenberger M
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Nov; 10():226. PubMed ID: 26555303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The dosimetric and radiobiological impact of calculation grid size on head and neck IMRT.
Srivastava SP; Cheng CW; Das IJ
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(3):209-217. PubMed ID: 27847266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pancreatic cancer planning: Complex conformal vs modulated therapies.
Chapman KL; Witek ME; Chen H; Showalter TN; Bar-Ad V; Harrison AS
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 26831922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison.
Kandula S; Zhu X; Garden AS; Gillin M; Rosenthal DI; Ang KK; Mohan R; Amin MV; Garcia JA; Wu R; Sahoo N; Frank SJ
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 23916884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive planning in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancers: single-institution experience and clinical implications.
Ahn PH; Chen CC; Ahn AI; Hong L; Scripes PG; Shen J; Lee CC; Miller E; Kalnicki S; Garg MK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Jul; 80(3):677-85. PubMed ID: 20619553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
