252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27929493)
1. Application programming in C# environment with recorded user software interactions and its application in autopilot of VMAT/IMRT treatment planning.
Wang H; Xing L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):189-203. PubMed ID: 27929493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of an autonomous treatment planning strategy for radiation therapy with effective use of population-based prior data.
Wang H; Dong P; Liu H; Xing L
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):389-396. PubMed ID: 28133746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using overlap volume histogram and IMRT plan data to guide and automate VMAT planning: a head-and-neck case study.
Wu B; Pang D; Simari P; Taylor R; Sanguineti G; McNutt T
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021714. PubMed ID: 23387737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The development of a deep reinforcement learning network for dose-volume-constrained treatment planning in prostate cancer intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Sprouts D; Gao Y; Wang C; Jia X; Shen C; Chi Y
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Jun; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 35523130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fully automated searching for the optimal VMAT jaw settings based on Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI) and RapidPlan knowledge-based planning.
Huang Y; Yue H; Wang M; Li S; Zhang J; Liu Z; Zhang Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):177-182. PubMed ID: 29577614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatizing a nonscripting TPS for optimizing clinical workflow and reoptimizing IMRT/VMAT plans.
Ayala R; Ruiz G; Valdivielso T
Med Dosim; 2019 Winter; 44(4):409-414. PubMed ID: 30952384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated Field-In-Field (FIF) Plan Framework Combining Scripting Application Programming Interface and User-Executed Program for Breast Forward IMRT.
Kim H; Kwak J; Jung J; Jeong C; Yoon K; Lee SW; Ahn SD; Choi EK; Kim SS; Cho B
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818810391. PubMed ID: 30384804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of AAPM TG 119 to volumetric arc therapy (VMAT).
Mynampati DK; Yaparpalvi R; Hong L; Kuo HC; Mah D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3382. PubMed ID: 22955639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning.
Ahmed S; Nelms B; Gintz D; Caudell J; Zhang G; Moros EG; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5486-5497. PubMed ID: 28777469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical experience transitioning from IMRT to VMAT for head and neck cancer.
Studenski MT; Bar-Ad V; Siglin J; Cognetti D; Curry J; Tuluc M; Harrison AS
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 23246253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated radiation therapy treatment plan workflow using a commercial application programming interface.
Olsen LA; Robinson CG; He GR; Wooten HO; Yaddanapudi S; Mutic S; Yang D; Moore KL
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(6):358-67. PubMed ID: 25407855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A fast optimization approach for treatment planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Yan H; Dai JR; Li YX
Radiat Oncol; 2018 May; 13(1):101. PubMed ID: 29848368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation and evaluation of an intelligent automatic treatment planning robot for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Gao Y; Shen C; Jia X; Kyun Park Y
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jul; 184():109685. PubMed ID: 37120103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward truly optimal IMRT dose distribution: inverse planning with voxel-specific penalty.
Lougovski P; LeNoach J; Zhu L; Ma Y; Censor Y; Xing L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Dec; 9(6):629-36. PubMed ID: 21070085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three IMRT advanced planning tools: A multi-institutional side-by-side comparison.
Lu L; Sheng Y; Donaghue J; Liu Shen Z; Kolar M; Wu QJ; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):65-77. PubMed ID: 31364798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the feasibility of volumetric-modulated arc therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT): An analysis for complex head-neck, high-risk prostate and rectal cancer cases.
Cilla S; Deodato F; Digesù C; Macchia G; Picardi V; Ferro M; Sallustio G; De Spirito M; Piermattei A; Morganti AG
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 24342167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vector-model-supported approach in prostate plan optimization.
Liu ESF; Wu VWC; Harris B; Lehman M; Pryor D; Chan LWC
Med Dosim; 2017 Summer; 42(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 28318936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated VMAT treatment planning using sequential convex programming: algorithm development and clinical implementation.
Dursun P; Hong L; Jhanwar G; Huang Q; Zhou Y; Yang J; Pham H; Cervino L; Moran JM; Deasy JO; Zarepisheh M
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 68(15):. PubMed ID: 37343584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-institutional comparison of computer-based independent dose calculation for intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Kamima T; Baba H; Takahashi R; Yamashita M; Sugawara Y; Kawai D; Yamamoto T; Satou A; Tachibana H
Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():72-81. PubMed ID: 29472094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
