BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27929495)

  • 1. Investigation of dosimetric differences between the TMR 10 and convolution algorithm for Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery.
    Rojas-Villabona A; Kitchen N; Paddick I
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):217-229. PubMed ID: 27929495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gamma Knife radiosurgery with CT image-based dose calculation.
    Xu AY; Bhatnagar J; Bednarz G; Niranjan A; Kondziolka D; Flickinger J; Lunsford LD; Huq MS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):119–129. PubMed ID: 26699563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric comparison of absolute and relative dose distributions between tissue maximum ratio and convolution algorithms for acoustic neurinoma plans in Gamma Knife radiosurgery.
    Nakazawa H; Komori M; Shibamoto Y; Tsugawa T; Mori Y; Kobayashi T
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2014 Aug; 156(8):1483-9; discussion 1489. PubMed ID: 24890937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose differences between the three dose calculation algorithms in Leksell GammaPlan.
    Xu AY; Bhatnagar J; Bednarz G; Niranjan A; Flickinger J; Lunsford LD; Huq MS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 15(5):4844. PubMed ID: 25207570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of density variation on photon dose calculation and its impact on intensity modulated radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Liu Q; Liang J; Stanhope CW; Yan D
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5717. PubMed ID: 27782711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional assessment of the effects of high-density embolization material on the absorbed dose in the target for Gamma Knife radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations.
    Watanabe Y; Sandhu D; Warmington L; Moen S; Tummala R
    J Neurosurg; 2016 Dec; 125(Suppl 1):123-128. PubMed ID: 27903193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Convolution algorithm with TMR10 for Leksell Gamma knife and dosimetric verification with radiochromic gel dosimeter.
    Osmancikova P; Novotny J; Solc J; Pipek J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):138-144. PubMed ID: 29226607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verification of dose profiles generated by the convolution algorithm of the gamma knife
    Chung HT; Park JH; Chun KJ
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4880-4889. PubMed ID: 28513854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose differences in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo for lung SBRT.
    Liu H; Zhuang T; Stephans K; Videtic G; Raithel S; Djemil T; Xia P
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):91–99. PubMed ID: 26699560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the use of a convolution-superposition algorithm for plan checking in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.
    Hardcastle N; Oborn BM; Haworth A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):99-110. PubMed ID: 27685114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Zheng D; Zhang Q; Liang X; Zhu X; Verma V; Wang S; Zhou S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):48-58. PubMed ID: 27455476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do we need Monte Carlo treatment planning for linac based radiosurgery? A case study.
    Ayyangar KM; Jiang SB
    Med Dosim; 1998; 23(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 9783269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetric evaluation of the Leksell GammaPlan
    Logothetis A; Pantelis E; Zoros E; Pappas EP; Dimitriadis A; Paddick I; Garding J; Johansson J; Kollias G; Karaiskos P
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(4):045011. PubMed ID: 31860889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Still equivalent for dose calculation in the Monte Carlo era? A comparison of free breathing and average intensity projection CT datasets for lung SBRT using three generations of dose calculation algorithms.
    Zvolanek K; Ma R; Zhou C; Liang X; Wang S; Verma V; Zhu X; Zhang Q; Driewer J; Lin C; Zhen W; Wahl A; Zhou SM; Zheng D
    Med Phys; 2017 May; 44(5):1939-1947. PubMed ID: 28273341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Using MRI Based Synthetic CT Generated by Fully Convolutional Neural Network for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery.
    Yuan J; Fredman E; Jin JY; Choi S; Mansur D; Sloan A; Machtay M; Zheng Y
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211046433. PubMed ID: 34632872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculation algorithms and penumbra: Underestimation of dose in organs at risk in dosimetry audits.
    Hughes J; Lye JE; Kadeer F; Alves A; Shaw M; Supple J; Keehan S; Gibbons F; Lehmann J; Kron T
    Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):6184-6197. PubMed ID: 34287963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Monte Carlo model and its commissioning for the Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion radiosurgery system.
    Yuan J; Machtay M
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4910-4918. PubMed ID: 28599073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
    Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
    Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetric accuracy of the Convolution algorithm for Leksell Gamma Plan radiosurgery treatment planning: Evaluation in the presence of clinically relevant inhomogeneities.
    Pantelis E; Logothetis A; Zoros E; Pappas EP; Papagiannis P; Paddick I; Nordström H; Kollias G; Karaiskos P
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 May; 24(5):e13903. PubMed ID: 36655619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.