153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27929507)
1. Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking.
Scott AW; Zhou Y; Allahverdian J; Nute JL; Lee C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):343-355. PubMed ID: 27929507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232.
Dave JK; Jones AK; Fisher R; Hulme K; Rill L; Zamora D; Woodward A; Brady S; MacDougall RD; Goldman L; Lang S; Peck D; Apgar B; Shepard SJ; Uzenoff R; Willis C
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1146-e1160. PubMed ID: 30255505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS: IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE.
Mourik JE; van der Tol P; Veldkamp WJ; Geleijns J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):303-7. PubMed ID: 26535003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of dose-area product of common radiographic examinations towards establishing a preliminary diagnostic reference levels (PDRLs) in Southwestern Nigeria.
Jibiri NN; Olowookere CJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):392-404. PubMed ID: 27929511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the effects of subject thickness on the exposure index in digital radiography.
Takaki T; Takeda K; Murakami S; Ogawa H; Ogawa M; Sakamoto M
Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jan; 9(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 26613753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Projection X-ray Imaging: Radiography, Mammography, Fluoroscopy.
Seibert JA
Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):148-156. PubMed ID: 30585956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local diagnostic reference levels for typical radiographic procedures.
Tonkopi E; Daniels C; Gale MJ; Schofield SC; Sorhaindo VA; Vanlarkin JL
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2012 Nov; 63(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 22136965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. OPTIMIZING IMAGE QUALITY, RADIATION DOSAGE TO THE PATIENT AND TO THE DETECTOR IN PEDIATRIC CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY OF A PORTABLE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM.
Shahgeldi K; Sjöberg T; Nordström J; Lesanu R; Svahn TM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 30916753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool.
Brady SL; Kaufman RA
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2489-97. PubMed ID: 25979042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography.
Lewis S; Pieterse T; Lawrence H
J Med Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 66(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 30834686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monitoring clinical exposure index and deviation index for dose optimization based on national diagnostic reference level: Focusing on general radiography of extremities.
Park H; Yoon Y; Kim E; Jeong H; Kim J
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 35124635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nationwide surveys of chest, abdomen, lumbosacral spine radiography, and upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy: a summary of findings.
Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Hilohi MC; Moyal AE
Health Phys; 2010 Mar; 98(3):498-514. PubMed ID: 20147791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of image quality among three X-ray systems for chest radiography: first step in optimisation.
Nocetti D; Ubeda C; Calcagno S; Acevedo J; Pardo D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):386-91. PubMed ID: 25821212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. COMPARISON OF RADIATION EXPOSURE TO THE PATIENT AND CONTRAST DETAIL RESOLUTIONS ACROSS LOW DOSE 2D/3D SLOT SCANNER AND TWO CONVENTIONAL DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS.
Abdi AJ; Mussmann B; Mackenzie A; Klaerke B; Andersen PE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):252-265. PubMed ID: 30809672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population.
Seibert JA; Morin RL
Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 21491197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient dose, image quality and radiographic techniques for common X ray examinations in two Greek hospitals and comparison with European guidelines.
Papadimitriou D; Perris A; Molfetas MG; Panagiotakis N; Manetou A; Tsourouflis G; Vassileva J; Chronopoulos P; Karapanagiotou O; Kottou S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 95(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 11468804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
