These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27929507)

  • 21. [Quality control--patient doses--guidance dose levels from diagnostic radiology in Tunisia].
    Ben Omrane L; Chahed N; Hammou A; Mtimet S
    Tunis Med; 2007 Jun; 85(6):465-8. PubMed ID: 17644898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. FEASIBILITY OF DISPLAYED EXPOSURE INDEX IN IEC STANDARD FRAMEWORK AS A DOSE OPTIMISATION TOOL FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Park H; Yoon Y; Tanaka N; Kim J; Kim J; Morishita J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(3):384-394. PubMed ID: 32364600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The validity and reliability of the exposure index as a metric for estimating the radiation dose to the patient.
    Erenstein HG; Browne D; Curtin S; Dwyer RS; Higgins RN; Hommel SF; Menzinga J; Pires Jorge JA; Sauty M; de Vries G; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Oct; 26 Suppl 2():S94-S99. PubMed ID: 32291123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Proper Management of the Clinical Exposure Index Based on Body Thickness Using Dose Optimization Tools in Digital Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study.
    Yoon Y; Park H; Kim J; Kim J; Roh Y; Tanaka N; Morishita J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34068390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors.
    Compagnone G; Casadio Baleni M; Di Nicola E; Valentino M; Benati M; Calzolaio LF; Oberhofer N; Fabbri E; Domenichelli S; Barozzi L
    Radiol Med; 2013 Jun; 118(4):540-54. PubMed ID: 23090253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Local reference dose evaluation in conventional radiography examinations in Iran.
    Shirin Shandiz M; Bahreyni Toosi MT; Farsi S; Yaghobi K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4550. PubMed ID: 24710442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relationship between detector size and the need for extra images and their effect on radiation exposure in digital mammography screening.
    Entz K; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2014 Sep; 186(9):868-75. PubMed ID: 24563411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retrospective patient dose analysis of a digital radiography system in routine clinical use.
    Schuncke A; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 15933094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Comparative evaluation of six different body regions of the dog using analog and digital radiography].
    Meyer-Lindenberg A; Ebermaier C; Wolvekamp P; Tellhelm B; Meutstege FJ; Lang J; Hartung K; Fehr M; Nolte I
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2008; 121(5-6):216-27. PubMed ID: 18557526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlation of image quality with exposure index and processing protocol in a computed radiography system.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Blastaris GA; Moutsatsos AS; Chios PS; Efstathopoulos EP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 18245792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exposure index in digital radiography: initial results of awareness and knowledge from Nigerian digital radiography practices.
    Esien-Umo EO; Erim AE; Chiaghanam NO; Ogbu T; Ijever AW; Archibong BE; Osakwe CA; Ekpo EU
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 54(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 36456458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Technical note: Four-year experience with utilization of DICOM metadata analytics in clinical digital radiography practice.
    Long Z; Walz-Flannigan AI; Littrell LA; Schueler BA
    Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):831-836. PubMed ID: 36542418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retrospective evaluation of exposure index (EI) values from plain radiographs reveals important considerations for quality improvement.
    Mothiram U; Brennan PC; Robinson J; Lewis SJ; Moran B
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2013 Dec; 60(4):115-22. PubMed ID: 26229619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of a new type of direct digital radiography machine.
    Beningfield SJ; Potgieter JH; Bautz P; Shackleton M; Hering E; de Jager G; Bowie G; Marshall M; Cox G; Pagliari G; Coetzee N
    S Afr Med J; 1999 Nov; 89(11):1182-8. PubMed ID: 10599300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. DigiBit: A System for Adjusting Radiographic Exposure Factors in the Digital Era.
    Ching W; Robinson J; McEntee MF
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 26199434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
    Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. IVEU: IT-based collection and reporting of radiological examination parameters.
    Hermen J; Jahnen A; Kolodziej M; Bender T; Fiebich M; Borowski M; Bressel S; Madsack B; Walz M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):57-61. PubMed ID: 25802461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Exposure creep in computed radiography: a longitudinal study.
    Gibson DJ; Davidson RA
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 22225727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.