These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27929509)
1. Comparison of the low-contrast detectability of two ultrasound systems using a grayscale phantom. Lorentsson R; Hosseini N; Johansson JO; Rosenberg W; Stenborg B; Månsson LG; Båth M J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):366-378. PubMed ID: 27929509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective assessment of low contrast detectability in computed tomography with Channelized Hotelling Observer. Racine D; Ba AH; Ott JG; Bochud FO; Verdun FR Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26515665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol. Klink T; Obmann V; Heverhagen J; Stork A; Adam G; Begemann P Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1645-54. PubMed ID: 25037931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low contrast detectability performance of model observers based on CT phantom images: kVp influence. Hernandez-Giron I; Calzado A; Geleijns J; Joemai RM; Veldkamp WJ Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):798-807. PubMed ID: 25979210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems. Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability. Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between human observer performance and model observer performance in differential phase contrast CT. Li K; Garrett J; Chen GH Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111905. PubMed ID: 24320438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated assessment of low contrast sensitivity for CT systems using a model observer. Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J; Calzado A; Veldkamp WJ Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38 Suppl 1():S25. PubMed ID: 21978115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of low-contrast detectability between two CT reconstruction algorithms using voxel-based 3D printed textured phantoms. Solomon J; Ba A; Bochud F; Samei E Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6497. PubMed ID: 27908164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media. Grant KL; Flohr TG; Krauss B; Sedlmair M; Thomas C; Schmidt B Invest Radiol; 2014 Sep; 49(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 24710203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing image quality and dose reduction of a new x-ray computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithm using model observers. Tseng HW; Fan J; Kupinski MA; Sainath P; Hsieh J Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071910. PubMed ID: 24989388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of radiation dose and image quality of computed tomography images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Hussain FA; Mail N; Shamy AM; Suliman A; Saoudi A J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 27167261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of iterative reconstructions on image noise and low-contrast object detection in low kVp simulated abdominal CT: a phantom study. Holmquist F; Nyman U; Siemund R; Geijer M; Söderberg M Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1079-88. PubMed ID: 26663036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy. Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image Noise, CNR, and Detectability of Low-Contrast, Low-Attenuation Liver Lesions in a Phantom: Effects of Radiation Exposure, Phantom Size, Integrated Circuit Detector, and Iterative Reconstruction. Goenka AH; Herts BR; Dong F; Obuchowski NA; Primak AN; Karim W; Baker ME Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 26937709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v. Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A phantom study for ground-glass nodule detectability using chest digital tomosynthesis with iterative reconstruction algorithm by ten observers: association with radiation dose and nodular characteristics. Miyata K; Nagatani Y; Ikeda M; Takahashi M; Nitta N; Matsuo S; Ohta S; Otani H; Nitta-Seko A; Murakami Y; Tsuchiya K; Inoue A; Misaki S; Erdenee K; Kida T; Murata K Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160555. PubMed ID: 28102693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How Different Iterative and Filtered Back Projection Kernels Affect Computed Tomography Numbers and Low Contrast Detectability. Völgyes D; Pedersen M; Stray-Pedersen A; Waaler D; Martinsen AC J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017 Jan; 41(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 27529681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of subjective assessment of the low-contrast visibility in constancy control of computed tomography. Thilander-Klang A; Ledenius K; Hansson J; Sund P; Båth M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):449-54. PubMed ID: 20176732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT image quality in sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction phantom study - is there a point of diminishing returns? Infante JC; Liu Y; Rigsby CK Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Mar; 47(3):333-341. PubMed ID: 27891546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]