These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27930827)

  • 1. Reasons for Lack of Consensus in Forensic Pathologist Interpretation of Photographs of Patterns of Injury of the Skin
    Oliver WR
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):674-680. PubMed ID: 27930827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of History and Context on Forensic Pathologist Interpretation of Photographs of Patterned Injury of the Skin.
    Oliver WR
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Nov; 62(6):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 28345246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forensic Pathologist Consensus in the Interpretation of Photographs of Patterned Injuries of the Skin.
    Oliver WR; Fang X
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jul; 61(4):972-8. PubMed ID: 27364275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Focussing on the future: survey results on the image capture of patterned cutaneous injuries.
    Evans S; Baylis S; Carabott R; Jones M; Lawson Z; Marsh N; Payne-James J; Ramadani J; Vanezis P; Kemp A
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2014 May; 24():7-11. PubMed ID: 24794842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a methodology for the standardisation and improvement of 'Smartphone' photography of patterned bruises and other cutaneous injuries.
    Biggs PR; Evans ST; Jones MD; Theobald PS
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 23937947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of photographs to record variation in bruising response in humans.
    Lecomte MM; Holmes T; Kay DP; Simons JL; Vintiner SK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Sep; 231(1-3):213-8. PubMed ID: 23890640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forensic 3D documentation of skin injuries using photogrammetry: photographs vs video and manual vs automatic measurements.
    Flies MJ; Larsen PK; Lynnerup N; Villa C
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 May; 133(3):963-971. PubMed ID: 30560492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Survey of Attitudes of Board-Certified Veterinary Pathologists to Forensic Veterinary Pathology.
    McEwen BJ; McDonough SP
    Vet Pathol; 2016 Sep; 53(5):1099-102. PubMed ID: 26926083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Photography in bite mark and patterned injury documentation--Part 2: A case study.
    Wright FD
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jul; 43(4):881-7. PubMed ID: 9670513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of image quality on the assessment of child abuse photographs.
    Melville JD; Lukefahr JL; Cornell J; Kellogg ND; Lancaster JL
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2013 May; 29(5):607-11. PubMed ID: 23603650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Coronary Artery Stenosis Estimates Made by Forensic Pathologists and Medical Students.
    Messner M; Meyers SE; Kemp WL
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):487-491. PubMed ID: 31529695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic 3D documentation of skin injuries.
    Villa C
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 May; 131(3):751-759. PubMed ID: 27913880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who Is a Pathologist According to Oncology Patients and Internet Users? A Survey Study.
    Kunc M; Miszewski K; Bieńkowski M; Kamieniecki A; Ekman M; Gorczyński A; Biernat W
    J Cancer Educ; 2021 Apr; 36(2):370-376. PubMed ID: 31667680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consensus on performing skin biopsies, laboratory workup, evaluation of tissue samples and reporting of the results in patients with suspected cutaneous graft-versus-host disease.
    Hillen U; Häusermann P; Massi D; Janin A; Wolff D; Lawitschka A; Greinix H; Meyer R; Ziemer M
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 May; 29(5):948-54. PubMed ID: 25265987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital photography as an object of forensic medical examination].
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2005; 48(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 15747849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concordance Rate for the Identification of Distant Entrance Gunshot Wounds of the Back by Experienced Forensic Pathologists Examining Only Images of Autopsies.
    Heninger M
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):352-360. PubMed ID: 27404608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Raising future forensic pathologists (first report): results of a preliminary questionnaire survey.
    Murakami M; Matoba K; Terazawa K
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 2012 Aug; 87(4-5):153-7. PubMed ID: 23016267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.
    Elmore JG; Longton GM; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Allison KH; Schnitt SJ; O'Malley FP; Weaver DL
    JAMA; 2015 Mar; 313(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 25781441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual assessment of the timing of bruising by forensic experts.
    Pilling ML; Vanezis P; Perrett D; Johnston A
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2010 Apr; 17(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 20211455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of photography training on the accurate representation of gunshot and stab wounds in autopsies: a comparative study.
    Özkök A; Akar T; Demirel B
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37996725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.