305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27931256)
1. Comparison of marginal fit of cemented zirconia copings manufactured after digital impression with lava™ C.O.S and conventional impression technique.
Dauti R; Cvikl B; Franz A; Schwarze UY; Lilaj B; Rybaczek T; Moritz A
BMC Oral Health; 2016 Dec; 16(1):129. PubMed ID: 27931256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
An S; Kim S; Choi H; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated after conventional impression making and digital scanning: An in vitro study.
Carrilho Baltazar Vaz IM; Pimentel Coelho Lino Carracho JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):223.e1-223.e6. PubMed ID: 32336539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings.
Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç HI; Albayrak H
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of an indirect impression scanning system and two direct intraoral scanning systems in vivo.
Bosniac P; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2421-2427. PubMed ID: 30298453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vertical marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated with one direct and three indirect digital scanning techniques.
Akhlaghian M; Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Pardis S
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 32868029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal and internal fit of zirconia copings obtained using different digital scanning methods.
Pedroche LO; Bernardes SR; Leão MP; Kintopp CC; Correr GM; Ornaghi BP; Gonzaga CC
Braz Oral Res; 2016 Oct; 30(1):e113. PubMed ID: 27737366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of milling systems and marginal configurations on the fit of yttrium stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP)' copings.
Al-Aali KA; Bin-Shuwaish MS; Alhenaki AM; Al Ahdal K; Al Deeb L; Maawadh AM; AlHelal A; Alshehri H; Vohra F; Abduljabbar T
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800020924514. PubMed ID: 33356766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of Intra-Oral Scanner (I.O.S.) on The Marginal Accuracy of CAD/CAM Single Crowns.
Ferrini F; Sannino G; Chiola C; Capparé P; Gastaldi G; Gherlone EF
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Feb; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 30769768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The fit of crowns produced using digital impression systems.
Vennerstrom M; Fakhary M; Von Steyern PV
Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(3):101-10. PubMed ID: 25796804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Micro-CT evaluation of marginal and internal fit of cemented polymer infiltrated ceramic network material crowns manufactured after conventional and digital impressions.
Dauti R; Cvikl B; Lilaj B; Heimel P; Moritz A; Schedle A
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 29891419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow.
Seelbach P; Brueckel C; Wöstmann B
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Sep; 17(7):1759-64. PubMed ID: 23086333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between five CAD/CAM systems for fit of zirconia copings.
Habib SR; Al Otaibi AK; Al Anazi TA; Al Anazi SM
Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(6):437-444. PubMed ID: 29756132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of the internal and marginal misfit of CAD/CAM zirconia copings.
Lins L; Bemfica V; Queiroz C; Canabarro A
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 25453562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
