BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27931951)

  • 1. Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Kumar S; Thosani N; Ladabaum U; Friedland S; Chen AM; Kochar R; Banerjee S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 27931951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO
    Anderson JC; Kahi CJ; Sullivan A; MacPhail M; Garcia J; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):591-598. PubMed ID: 30367879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.
    Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of colorectal adenoma by narrow band imaging (HQ190) vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Leung WK; Lo OS; Liu KS; Tong T; But DY; Lam FY; Hsu AS; Wong SY; Seto WK; Hung IF; Law WL
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 109(6):855-63. PubMed ID: 24751581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.
    Chung SJ; Kim D; Song JH; Park MJ; Kim YS; Kim JS; Jung HC; Song IS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 20493487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.
    Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced Adenoma Miss Rate With 9-Minute vs 6-Minute Withdrawal Times for Screening Colonoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Tandem Trial.
    Zhao S; Song Y; Wang S; Wang R; Feng Z; Gong A; Yang X; Pan P; Yao D; Zhang J; Zhu Y; Li T; Bi J; Ren X; Tang X; Li Q; Yu D; Zheng J; Song B; Wang P; Chen W; Shang G; Xu Y; Xu P; Lai Y; Xu H; Yang X; Sheng J; Tao Y; Li X; Zhu Y; Zhang X; Shen H; Ma Y; Wang F; Wu L; Wang X; Li Z; Bai Y
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2023 May; 118(5):802-811. PubMed ID: 36219172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deep Learning Computer-aided Polyp Detection Reduces Adenoma Miss Rate: A United States Multi-center Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study (CADeT-CS Trial).
    Glissen Brown JR; Mansour NM; Wang P; Chuchuca MA; Minchenberg SB; Chandnani M; Liu L; Gross SA; Sengupta N; Berzin TM
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Jul; 20(7):1499-1507.e4. PubMed ID: 34530161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
    Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy in adenoma detection: randomized tandem study-DEtection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial (DETECT).
    Rameshshanker R; Tsiamoulos Z; Wilson A; Rajendran A; Bassett P; Tekkis P; Saunders BP
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Apr; 91(4):894-904.e1. PubMed ID: 31836474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New-generation full-spectrum endoscopy versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, tandem colonoscopy trial (J-FUSE Study).
    Kudo T; Saito Y; Ikematsu H; Hotta K; Takeuchi Y; Shimatani M; Kawakami K; Tamai N; Mori Y; Maeda Y; Yamada M; Sakamoto T; Matsuda T; Imai K; Ito S; Hamada K; Fukata N; Inoue T; Tajiri H; Yoshimura K; Ishikawa H; Kudo SE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Nov; 88(5):854-864. PubMed ID: 29908178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study.
    Han JH; Kim HG; Ahn EM; Park S; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Kwak MS; Jung Y; Shin JE; Shin HD; Cho YS
    Gut Liver; 2022 Sep; 16(5):716-725. PubMed ID: 34933279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of detection and miss rates of narrow band imaging, flexible spectral imaging chromoendoscopy and white light at screening colonoscopy: a randomised controlled back-to-back study.
    Chung SJ; Kim D; Song JH; Kang HY; Chung GE; Choi J; Kim YS; Park MJ; Kim JS
    Gut; 2014 May; 63(5):785-91. PubMed ID: 23853211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Zhao S; Wang S; Pan P; Xia T; Chang X; Yang X; Guo L; Meng Q; Yang F; Qian W; Xu Z; Wang Y; Wang Z; Gu L; Wang R; Jia F; Yao J; Li Z; Bai Y
    Gastroenterology; 2019 May; 156(6):1661-1674.e11. PubMed ID: 30738046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
    Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
    DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison study.
    Kushnir VM; Oh YS; Hollander T; Chen CH; Sayuk GS; Davidson N; Mullady D; Murad FM; Sharabash NM; Ruettgers E; Dassopoulos T; Easler JJ; Gyawali CP; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 110(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 25732415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates during endoscopic training: a venture into uncharted territory.
    Munroe CA; Lee P; Copland A; Wu KK; Kaltenbach T; Soetikno RM; Friedland S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 22341103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of 9-Minute Withdrawal Time on the Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Zhao S; Yang X; Wang S; Meng Q; Wang R; Bo L; Chang X; Pan P; Xia T; Yang F; Yao J; Zheng J; Sheng J; Zhao X; Tang S; Wang Y; Wang Y; Gong A; Chen W; Shen J; Zhu X; Wang S; Yan C; Yang Y; Zhu Y; Ma RJ; Wang R; Ma Y; Li Z; Bai Y
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Feb; 20(2):e168-e181. PubMed ID: 33220526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas.
    Coe SG; Crook JE; Diehl NN; Wallace MB
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 108(2):219-26; quiz 227. PubMed ID: 23295274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.