These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The function of "looking-at-nothing" for sequential sensorimotor tasks: Eye movements to remembered action-target locations. Foerster RM J Eye Mov Res; 2019 Jun; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33828728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Saccadic eye movements in the dark while performing an automatized sequential high-speed sensorimotor task. Foerster RM; Carbone E; Koesling H; Schneider WX J Vis; 2012 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 22323821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Saccadic eye movements in a high-speed bimanual stacking task: changes of attentional control during learning and automatization. Foerster RM; Carbone E; Koesling H; Schneider WX J Vis; 2011 Jun; 11(7):9. PubMed ID: 21665985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task. Foerster RM; Schneider WX Vision (Basel); 2019 Aug; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 31735843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection. MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation. Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early Shift of Attention Is Not Regulated by Mind Wandering in Visual Search. Vogelgesang L; Reichert C; Hinrichs H; Heinze HJ; Dürschmid S Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():552637. PubMed ID: 33117116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Manual response preparation and saccade programming are linked to attention shifts: ERP evidence for covert attentional orienting and spatially specific modulations of visual processing. Eimer M; Van Velzen J; Gherri E; Press C Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 16448629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of task-relevant saccadic eye movements performed during the encoding of a serial sequence on visuospatial memory performance. Martin L; Tapper A; Gonzalez DA; Leclerc M; Niechwiej-Szwedo E Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1519-1529. PubMed ID: 28251336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Kinematic property of target motion conditions gaze behavior and eye-hand synergy during manual tracking. Huang CT; Hwang IS Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Dec; 32(6):1253-69. PubMed ID: 24054436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How task demands influence scanpath similarity in a sequential number-search task. Dewhurst R; Foulsham T; Jarodzka H; Johansson R; Holmqvist K; Nyström M Vision Res; 2018 Aug; 149():9-23. PubMed ID: 29857021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eye and hand movements during reconstruction of spatial memory. Burke MR; Allen RJ; Gonzalez C Perception; 2012; 41(7):803-18. PubMed ID: 23155732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Expecting the unexpected: Violation of expectation shifts strategies toward information exploration. Chen H; Yan N; Zhu P; Wyble B; Eitam B; Shen M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):513-522. PubMed ID: 30816787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responses to task-irrelevant visual features by primate prefrontal neurons. Lauwereyns J; Sakagami M; Tsutsui K; Kobayashi S; Koizumi M; Hikosaka O J Neurophysiol; 2001 Oct; 86(4):2001-10. PubMed ID: 11600657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]