These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27933016)

  • 1. Task-Irrelevant Expectation Violations in Sequential Manual Actions: Evidence for a "Check-after-Surprise" Mode of Visual Attention and Eye-Hand Decoupling.
    Foerster RM
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1845. PubMed ID: 27933016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expectation violations in sensorimotor sequences: shifting from LTM-based attentional selection to visual search.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():45-59. PubMed ID: 25708482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anticipatory eye movements in sensorimotor actions: on the role of guiding fixations during learning.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():227-31. PubMed ID: 26239751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Looking-at-nothing" during sequential sensorimotor actions: Long-term memory-based eye scanning of remembered target locations.
    Foerster RM
    Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():29-37. PubMed ID: 29432778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The function of "looking-at-nothing" for sequential sensorimotor tasks: Eye movements to remembered action-target locations.
    Foerster RM
    J Eye Mov Res; 2019 Jun; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33828728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Saccadic eye movements in the dark while performing an automatized sequential high-speed sensorimotor task.
    Foerster RM; Carbone E; Koesling H; Schneider WX
    J Vis; 2012 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 22323821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Saccadic eye movements in a high-speed bimanual stacking task: changes of attentional control during learning and automatization.
    Foerster RM; Carbone E; Koesling H; Schneider WX
    J Vis; 2011 Jun; 11(7):9. PubMed ID: 21665985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Vision (Basel); 2019 Aug; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 31735843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection.
    MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation.
    Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early Shift of Attention Is Not Regulated by Mind Wandering in Visual Search.
    Vogelgesang L; Reichert C; Hinrichs H; Heinze HJ; Dürschmid S
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():552637. PubMed ID: 33117116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task-irrelevant optic flow guides attention in visual search.
    Higuchi Y; Inoue S; Endo T; Kumada T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1327-1345. PubMed ID: 30684207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased experience amplifies the activation of task-irrelevant category representations.
    Wu R; Pruitt Z; Zinszer BD; Cheung OS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):522-532. PubMed ID: 27981522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Manual response preparation and saccade programming are linked to attention shifts: ERP evidence for covert attentional orienting and spatially specific modulations of visual processing.
    Eimer M; Van Velzen J; Gherri E; Press C
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 16448629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of task-relevant saccadic eye movements performed during the encoding of a serial sequence on visuospatial memory performance.
    Martin L; Tapper A; Gonzalez DA; Leclerc M; Niechwiej-Szwedo E
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1519-1529. PubMed ID: 28251336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kinematic property of target motion conditions gaze behavior and eye-hand synergy during manual tracking.
    Huang CT; Hwang IS
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Dec; 32(6):1253-69. PubMed ID: 24054436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How task demands influence scanpath similarity in a sequential number-search task.
    Dewhurst R; Foulsham T; Jarodzka H; Johansson R; Holmqvist K; Nyström M
    Vision Res; 2018 Aug; 149():9-23. PubMed ID: 29857021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye and hand movements during reconstruction of spatial memory.
    Burke MR; Allen RJ; Gonzalez C
    Perception; 2012; 41(7):803-18. PubMed ID: 23155732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expecting the unexpected: Violation of expectation shifts strategies toward information exploration.
    Chen H; Yan N; Zhu P; Wyble B; Eitam B; Shen M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):513-522. PubMed ID: 30816787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Responses to task-irrelevant visual features by primate prefrontal neurons.
    Lauwereyns J; Sakagami M; Tsutsui K; Kobayashi S; Koizumi M; Hikosaka O
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Oct; 86(4):2001-10. PubMed ID: 11600657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.