These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27935700)

  • 1. A Life Cycle Assessment Case Study of Coal-Fired Electricity Generation with Humidity Swing Direct Air Capture of CO
    van der Giesen C; Meinrenken CJ; Kleijn R; Sprecher B; Lackner KS; Kramer GJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 51(2):1024-1034. PubMed ID: 27935700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postcombustion Capture or Direct Air Capture in Decarbonizing US Natural Gas Power?
    Azarabadi H; Lackner KS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 54(8):5102-5111. PubMed ID: 32212696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Achieving Zero/Negative-Emissions Coal-Fired Power Plants Using Amine-Based Postcombustion CO
    Jiang K; Feron P; Cousins A; Zhai R; Li K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Feb; 54(4):2429-2438. PubMed ID: 31990528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
    White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation.
    Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Sep; 41(17):6290-6. PubMed ID: 17937317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The oxycoal process with cryogenic oxygen supply.
    Kather A; Scheffknecht G
    Naturwissenschaften; 2009 Sep; 96(9):993-1010. PubMed ID: 19495717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term energy and climate implications of carbon capture and storage deployment strategies in the US coal-fired electricity fleet.
    Sathre R; Masanet E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9768-76. PubMed ID: 22857130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
    Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective environmental burdens and benefits of fast-swing direct air carbon capture and storage.
    Ottenbros AB; van Zelm R; Simons J; van der Hulst MK; de Kleijne K; de Neve H; Huijbregts MAJ
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):16549. PubMed ID: 39019975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human and environmental impact assessment of postcombustion CO2 capture focusing on emissions from amine-based scrubbing solvents to air.
    Veltman K; Singh B; Hertwich EG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Feb; 44(4):1496-502. PubMed ID: 20095561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Life cycle emissions and cost of producing electricity from coal, natural gas, and wood pellets in Ontario, Canada.
    Zhang Y; McKechnie J; Cormier D; Lyng R; Mabee W; Ogino A; Maclean HL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):538-44. PubMed ID: 19961171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Siting is a constraint to realize environmental benefits from carbon capture and storage.
    Sekar A; Williams E; Chester M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11705-12. PubMed ID: 25187199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental and economic evaluation of bioenergy in Ontario, Canada.
    Zhang Y; Habibi S; MacLean HL
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Aug; 57(8):919-33. PubMed ID: 17824282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration.
    Dang Q; Mba Wright M; Brown RC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14688-95. PubMed ID: 26545153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling atmospheric oxidation of 2-aminoethanol (MEA) emitted from post-combustion capture using WRF-Chem.
    Karl M; Svendby T; Walker SE; Velken AS; Castell N; Solberg S
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Sep; 527-528():185-202. PubMed ID: 25958366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design of retrofit flue gas (CO
    Baloyi HI; Okonye LU; Ren J
    Sci Rep; 2024 Oct; 14(1):23500. PubMed ID: 39379390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.