These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27935791)
1. Lessons Learned From an Online Study with Dual-smoker Couples. Choi SH; Mitchell J; Lipkus I Am J Health Behav; 2017 Jan; 41(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 27935791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommendations From a Descriptive Evaluation to Improve Screening Procedures for Web-Based Studies With Couples: Cross-Sectional Study. Mitchell JW; Chavanduka TMD; Sullivan S; Stephenson R JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2020 May; 6(2):e15079. PubMed ID: 32396133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How Best to Obtain Valid, Verifiable Data Online From Male Couples? Lessons Learned From an eHealth HIV Prevention Intervention for HIV-Negative Male Couples. Mitchell J; Lee JY; Stephenson R JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2016 Sep; 2(2):e152. PubMed ID: 27649587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The good, bad, and ugly of online recruitment of parents for health-related focus groups: lessons learned. Quach S; Pereira JA; Russell ML; Wormsbecker AE; Ramsay H; Crowe L; Quan SD; Kwong J J Med Internet Res; 2013 Nov; 15(11):e250. PubMed ID: 24231040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ClickDiary: Online Tracking of Health Behaviors and Mood. Chan TC; Yen TJ; Fu YC; Hwang JS J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e147. PubMed ID: 26076583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving Data Integrity and Quality From Online Health Surveys of Women With Infant Children. Walker LO; Murry N; Longoria KD Nurs Res; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 72(5):386-391. PubMed ID: 37625181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lessons learned from the MOMENT study on how to recruit and retain a target population online, across borders, and with automated remote data collection. Belfiglio A; Page SD; Pettersson S; van Rijn M; Vellone E; Westland H; Freedland KE; Lee C; Strömberg A; Wiebe D; Aryal S; Riegel B; Jaarsma T PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0307440. PubMed ID: 39283903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of internet and mailing methods to recruit couples into research on unaided smoking cessation. Derrick JL; Eliseo-Arras RK; Hanny C; Britton M; Haddad S Addict Behav; 2017 Dec; 75():12-16. PubMed ID: 28662435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fraud Detection Protocol for Web-Based Research Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Development and Descriptive Evaluation. Ballard AM; Cardwell T; Young AM JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2019 Feb; 5(1):e12344. PubMed ID: 30714944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Overcoming Challenges of Online Research: Measures to Ensure Enrollment of Eligible Participants. Campbell CK; Ndukwe S; Dubé K; Sauceda JA; Saberi P J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2022 Oct; 91(2):232-236. PubMed ID: 36094490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Baseline Assessment Modality on Enrollment and Retention in a Facebook Smoking Cessation Study. Villanti AC; Jacobs MA; Zawistowski G; Brookover J; Stanton CA; Graham AL J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jul; 17(7):e179. PubMed ID: 26183789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Couples' daily self-regulation: The Health Action Process Approach at the dyadic level. Berli C; Lüscher J; Luszczynska A; Schwarzer R; Scholz U PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205887. PubMed ID: 30372470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Take the money and run? Redemption of a gift card incentive in a clinician survey. Chen JS; Sprague BL; Klabunde CN; Tosteson AN; Bitton A; Onega T; MacLean CD; Harris K; Schapira MM; Haas JS; BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():25. PubMed ID: 26911445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost. Ebert JF; Huibers L; Christensen B; Christensen MB J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e24. PubMed ID: 29362206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An updated protocol to detect invalid entries in an online survey of men who have sex with men (MSM): how do valid and invalid submissions compare? Grey JA; Konstan J; Iantaffi A; Wilkerson JM; Galos D; Rosser BR AIDS Behav; 2015 Oct; 19(10):1928-37. PubMed ID: 25805443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What is the Profile of Individuals Joining the KNEEguru Online Health Community? A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study. Bright P; Hambly K; Tamakloe S J Med Internet Res; 2016 Apr; 18(4):e84. PubMed ID: 27089531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What Predicts Online Health Information-Seeking Behavior Among Egyptian Adults? A Cross-Sectional Study. Ghweeba M; Lindenmeyer A; Shishi S; Abbas M; Waheed A; Amer S J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jun; 19(6):e216. PubMed ID: 28642216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ophthalmology patients' interest in online access to clinic notes at three US clinics. Lee BS; Oster NV; Chen GY; Ding LL; Walker JD; Elmore JG Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):420-427. PubMed ID: 28417473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health Information Obtained From the Internet and Changes in Medical Decision Making: Questionnaire Development and Cross-Sectional Survey. Chen YY; Li CM; Liang JC; Tsai CC J Med Internet Res; 2018 Feb; 20(2):e47. PubMed ID: 29434017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association Between Internet Use and Body Dissatisfaction Among Young Females: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Canadian Community Health Survey. Carter A; Forrest JI; Kaida A J Med Internet Res; 2017 Feb; 19(2):e39. PubMed ID: 28183688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]