BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27936012)

  • 1. Sugarcane transcriptome analysis in response to infection caused by Acidovorax avenae subsp. avenae.
    Santa Brigida AB; Rojas CA; Grativol C; de Armas EM; Entenza JO; Thiebaut F; Lima MF; Farrinelli L; Hemerly AS; Lifschitz S; Ferreira PC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0166473. PubMed ID: 27936012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Global Gene Responses of Resistant and Susceptible Sugarcane Cultivars to
    Chu N; Zhou JR; Fu HY; Huang MT; Zhang HL; Gao SJ
    Microorganisms; 2019 Dec; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 31861562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A transcriptomic analysis of sugarcane response to Leifsonia xyli subsp. xyli infection.
    Zhu K; Yang LT; Li CX; Lakshmanan P; Xing YX; Li YR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245613. PubMed ID: 33529190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transcriptome profile analysis of sugarcane responses to Sporisorium scitaminea infection using Solexa sequencing technology.
    Wu Q; Xu L; Guo J; Su Y; Que Y
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():298920. PubMed ID: 24288673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic and morphological variants of
    Zhao JY; Chen J; Hu ZT; Li J; Fu HY; Rott PC; Gao SJ
    Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1127928. PubMed ID: 36814761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of Resistant and Susceptible Sugarcane Cultivars in Response to Infection by
    Ntambo MS; Meng JY; Rott PC; Henry RJ; Zhang HL; Gao SJ
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 31817492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. De novo analysis of transcriptome reveals genes associated with leaf abscission in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.).
    Li M; Liang Z; Zeng Y; Jing Y; Wu K; Liang J; He S; Wang G; Mo Z; Tan F; Li S; Wang L
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Mar; 17():195. PubMed ID: 26946183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comprehensive transcriptome analysis reveals genes in response to water deficit in the leaves of Saccharum narenga (Nees ex Steud.) hack.
    Liu X; Zhang R; Ou H; Gui Y; Wei J; Zhou H; Tan H; Li Y
    BMC Plant Biol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):250. PubMed ID: 30342477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MLST Reveals a Separate and Novel Clonal Group for Acidovorax avenae Strains Causing Red Stripe in Sugarcane from Argentina.
    Fontana PD; Tomasini N; Fontana CA; Di Pauli V; Cocconcelli PS; Vignolo GM; Salazar SM
    Phytopathology; 2019 Mar; 109(3):358-365. PubMed ID: 30226422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A global view of transcriptome dynamics during Sporisorium scitamineum challenge in sugarcane by RNA-Seq.
    Que Y; Su Y; Guo J; Wu Q; Xu L
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e106476. PubMed ID: 25171065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative physiological and transcriptome analysis in cultivated and wild sugarcane species in response to hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress.
    Manimekalai R; Selvi A; Narayanan J; Vannish R; Shalini R; Gayathri S; Rabisha VP
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Mar; 24(1):155. PubMed ID: 36973642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A survey of the complex transcriptome from the highly polyploid sugarcane genome using full-length isoform sequencing and de novo assembly from short read sequencing.
    Hoang NV; Furtado A; Mason PJ; Marquardt A; Kasirajan L; Thirugnanasambandam PP; Botha FC; Henry RJ
    BMC Genomics; 2017 May; 18(1):395. PubMed ID: 28532419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A dynamic degradome landscape on miRNAs and their predicted targets in sugarcane caused by Sporisorium scitamineum stress.
    Su Y; Xiao X; Ling H; Huang N; Liu F; Su W; Zhang Y; Xu L; Muhammad K; Que Y
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):57. PubMed ID: 30658590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genome-wide analysis of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase gene family expression in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in sugarcane.
    Ali A; Chu N; Ma P; Javed T; Zaheer U; Huang MT; Fu HY; Gao SJ
    Physiol Plant; 2021 Jan; 171(1):86-107. PubMed ID: 32909626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcriptional analysis identifies major pathways as response components to Sporisorium scitamineum stress in sugarcane.
    Huang N; Ling H; Su Y; Liu F; Xu L; Su W; Wu Q; Guo J; Gao S; Que Y
    Gene; 2018 Dec; 678():207-218. PubMed ID: 30099025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large-scale identification of wheat genes resistant to cereal cyst nematode Heterodera avenae using comparative transcriptomic analysis.
    Kong LA; Wu DQ; Huang WK; Peng H; Wang GF; Cui JK; Liu SM; Li ZG; Yang J; Peng DL
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():801. PubMed ID: 26475271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Small RNA sequencing reveals a role for sugarcane miRNAs and their targets in response to Sporisorium scitamineum infection.
    Su Y; Zhang Y; Huang N; Liu F; Su W; Xu L; Ahmad W; Wu Q; Guo J; Que Y
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):325. PubMed ID: 28438123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship of Soil Properties and Sugarcane Yields to Red Stripe in Louisiana.
    Johnson RM; Grisham MP; Warnke KZ; Maggio JR
    Phytopathology; 2016 Jul; 106(7):737-44. PubMed ID: 27003508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of variation in the sugarcane transcriptome with sugar content.
    Thirugnanasambandam PP; Hoang NV; Furtado A; Botha FC; Henry RJ
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):909. PubMed ID: 29178834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative transcriptome profiling of resistant and susceptible sugarcane genotypes in response to the airborne pathogen Fusarium verticillioides.
    Wang Z; Li Y; Li C; Song X; Lei J; Gao Y; Liang Q
    Mol Biol Rep; 2019 Aug; 46(4):3777-3789. PubMed ID: 31006101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.