These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27936853)

  • 41. Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.
    Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 19883131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The neural correlates of strategic reading comprehension: cognitive control and discourse comprehension.
    Moss J; Schunn CD; Schneider W; McNamara DS; Vanlehn K
    Neuroimage; 2011 Sep; 58(2):675-86. PubMed ID: 21741484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Strategic Decisions in Task-Oriented Reading.
    Salmerón L; Vidal-Abarca E; Martínez T; Mañá A; Gil L; Naumann J
    Span J Psychol; 2015 Dec; 18():E102. PubMed ID: 26707969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Reading comprehension of students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: what is the role of executive functions?].
    Miranda-Casas A; Fernández MI; Robledo P; García-Castellar R
    Rev Neurol; 2010 Mar; 50 Suppl 3():S135-42. PubMed ID: 20200841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of use of reading comprehension strategies to improve reading comprehension of adult college students with acquired brain injury.
    Griffiths GG; Sohlberg MM; Kirk C; Fickas S; Biancarosa G
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2016; 26(2):161-90. PubMed ID: 25712402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improving college students' evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards.
    Dunlosky J; Hartwig MK; Rawson KA; Lipko AR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 20700858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparing comprehension measured by multiple-choice and open-ended questions.
    Ozuru Y; Briner S; Kurby CA; McNamara DS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Sep; 67(3):215-27. PubMed ID: 24041303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning?
    Richland LE; Kornell N; Kao LS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):243-57. PubMed ID: 19751074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Improving text comprehension: scaffolding adolescents into strategic reading.
    Ukrainetz TA
    Semin Speech Lang; 2015 Feb; 36(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 25633141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Hypercorrection of high-confidence errors in the classroom.
    Carpenter SK; Haynes CL; Corral D; Yeung KL
    Memory; 2018 Nov; 26(10):1379-1384. PubMed ID: 29781391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Using diagrams versus text for spaced restudy: Effects on learning in 10th grade biology classes.
    Bergey BW; Cromley JG; Kirchgessner ML; Newcombe NS
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Mar; 85(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 25529502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accounting for children's orthographic learning while reading text: do children self-teach?
    Cunningham AE
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Sep; 95(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 16714031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Hemispheric processing of predictive inferences: the effects of textual constraint and metacomprehension monitoring competence.
    Xu F; Fan L; Wang Z; Wang W; Meng J
    J Gen Psychol; 2021; 148(4):451-470. PubMed ID: 32799775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effects of age on processing and storage in working memory span tasks and reading comprehension.
    Schroeder PJ
    Exp Aging Res; 2014; 40(3):308-31. PubMed ID: 24785593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influences of deep learning, need for cognition and preparation time on open- and closed-book test performance.
    Heijne-Penninga M; Kuks JBM; Hofman WHA; Cohen-Schotanus J
    Med Educ; 2010 Sep; 44(9):884-891. PubMed ID: 20716098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text.
    Samuelstuen MS; Bråten I
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Apr; 46(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 15762939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. When pretesting fails to enhance learning concepts from reading texts.
    Hausman H; Rhodes MG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):331-346. PubMed ID: 29723010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Passageless comprehension on the Nelson-Denny reading test: well above chance for university students.
    Coleman C; Lindstrom J; Nelson J; Lindstrom W; Gregg KN
    J Learn Disabil; 2010; 43(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 19933897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An Investigation of the Outcomes of PGY Students' Cognition of and Persistent Behavior in Learning through the Intervention of the Flipped Classroom in Taiwan.
    Hsu SD; Chen CJ; Chang WK; Hu YJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167598. PubMed ID: 27911937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.