These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27936909)

  • 1. Variation in the Use of Open Pyeloplasty, Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty, and Endopyelotomy for the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults.
    Jacobs BL; Lai JC; Seelam R; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS
    J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 27936909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost Analysis of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.
    Jacobs BL; Seelam R; Lai JC; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS
    J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 27927021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trends in the treatment of adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Jacobs BL; Kaufman SR; Morgenstern H; Hollenbeck BK; Wolf JS; Hollingsworth JM
    J Endourol; 2013 Mar; 27(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 22967009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.
    Jacobs BL; Lai JC; Seelam R; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS;
    Urology; 2018 Jan; 111():72-77. PubMed ID: 28943371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equivocal ureteropelvic junction obstruction on diuretic renogram--should minimally invasive pyeloplasty be offered to symptomatic patients?
    Ozayar A; Friedlander JI; Shakir NA; Gahan JC; Cadeddu JA; Morgan MS
    J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1278-82. PubMed ID: 25444983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate.
    Danuser H; Ackermann DK; Böhlen D; Studer UE
    J Urol; 1998 Jan; 159(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 9400436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade.
    Yanke BV; Lallas CD; Pagnani C; McGinnis DE; Bagley DH
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1397-402. PubMed ID: 18707717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Management of Adult UPJ Obstruction.
    Strother MC; Mucksavage P
    Curr Urol Rep; 2016 May; 17(5):39. PubMed ID: 26968419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
    Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.
    Dimarco DS; Gettman MT; McGee SM; Chow GK; Leroy AJ; Slezak J; Patterson DE; Segura JW
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.
    Brooks JD; Kavoussi LR; Preminger GM; Schuessler WW; Moore RG
    Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):791-5. PubMed ID: 7502417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is antegrade endopyelotomy really less invasive than open pyeloplasty?
    Dobry E; Usai P; Studer UE; Danuser H
    Urol Int; 2007; 79(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 17851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a critical analysis of results.
    Eden CG
    Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):983-9. PubMed ID: 17629395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pediatric endopyelotomy: the Washington University experience.
    Figenshau RS; Clayman RV; Colberg JW; Coplen DE; Soble JJ; Manley CB
    J Urol; 1996 Dec; 156(6):2025-30. PubMed ID: 8911382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National trends and disparities in the use of minimally invasive adult pyeloplasty.
    Sukumar S; Sun M; Karakiewicz PI; Friedman AA; Chun FK; Sammon J; Ghani KR; Ravi P; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Peabody JO; Elder JS; Menon M; Trinh QD
    J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):913-8. PubMed ID: 22819404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practice trends in contemporary management of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Marcovich R; Jacobson AI; Aldana JP; Lee BR; Smith AD
    Urology; 2003 Jul; 62(1):22-5; discussion 25-6. PubMed ID: 12837413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of percutaneous endopyelotomy with open pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Schenkman EM; Tarry WF
    J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):1013-5. PubMed ID: 9474220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.