102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27936993)
1. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery at the university hospital in Barcelona.
Baranov A; Gratacós E; Vikhareva O; Figueras F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Dec; 30(24):2998-3003. PubMed ID: 27936993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of prediction model for successful vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery based on sonographic assessment of hysterotomy scar.
Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 28233347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate?
Harris BS; Heine RP; Park J; Faurot KR; Hopkins MK; Rivara AJ; Kemeny HR; Grotegut CA; Jelovsek JE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):492.e1-492.e7. PubMed ID: 30716285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean.
Chaillet N; Bujold E; Dubé E; Grobman WA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Feb; 35(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 23470060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.
Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Faucett AM; Grobman WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 125(4):948-952. PubMed ID: 25751218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does midtrimester cervical length aid in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean?
Miller ES; Sakowicz A; Donelan EA; Grobman WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):791.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25726519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External validation of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery calculator in Israeli cohort of parturients and construction of an improved model.
Haggiag N; Eitan S; Maor-Sagie E; Hallak M; Gabbay-Benziv R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 161(1):182-189. PubMed ID: 36066199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: the development of a Western European population-based prediction model for deliveries at term.
Schoorel EN; van Kuijk SM; Melman S; Nijhuis JG; Smits LJ; Aardenburg R; de Boer K; Delemarre FM; van Dooren IM; Franssen MT; Kaplan M; Kleiverda G; Kuppens SM; Kwee A; Lim FT; Mol BW; Roumen FJ; Sikkema JM; Smid-Koopman E; Visser H; Woiski M; Hermens RP; Scheepers HC
BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(2):194-201; discussion 201. PubMed ID: 24373593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Bhide A; Caric V; Arulkumaran S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 26952353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean in the preterm period.
Mardy AH; Ananth CV; Grobman WA; Gyamfi-Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):513.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27262971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Costantine MM; Fox K; Byers BD; Mateus J; Ghulmiyyah LM; Blackwell S; Hankins GDV; Grobman WA; Saade G
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 20168103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity.
Grobman WA; Sandoval G; Rice MM; Bailit JL; Chauhan SP; Costantine MM; Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Metz TD; Parry S; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Simhan HN; Thorp JM; Tita ATN; Longo M; Landon MB;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 225(6):664.e1-664.e7. PubMed ID: 34043983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women.
Yokoi A; Ishikawa K; Miyazaki K; Yoshida K; Furuhashi M; Tamakoshi K
Int J Med Sci; 2012; 9(6):488-91. PubMed ID: 22927774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model.
Fagerberg MC; Maršál K; Källén K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():88-94. PubMed ID: 25801723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate.
Schoorel EN; Melman S; van Kuijk SM; Grobman WA; Kwee A; Mol BW; Nijhuis JG; Smits LJ; Aardenburg R; de Boer K; Delemarre FM; van Dooren IM; Franssen MT; Kleiverda G; Kaplan M; Kuppens SM; Lim FT; Sikkema JM; Smid-Koopman E; Visser H; Vrouenraets FP; Woiski M; Hermens RP; Scheepers HC
BJOG; 2014 Jun; 121(7):840-7; discussion 847. PubMed ID: 24533534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - the benefit of prior vaginal delivery.
Ashwal E; Wertheimer A; Aviram A; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y; Hiersch L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(16):2665-70. PubMed ID: 26399162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of vaginal birth after one ceasarean delivery for non-progressive labor.
Mizrachi Y; Barber E; Kovo M; Bar J; Lurie S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jan; 297(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 29052016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does information available at delivery improve the accuracy of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean? Validation of the published models in an independent patient cohort.
Costantine MM; Fox KA; Pacheco LD; Mateus J; Hankins GD; Grobman WA; Saade GR
Am J Perinatol; 2011 Apr; 28(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 21225561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission.
Metz TD; Stoddard GJ; Henry E; Jackson M; Holmgren C; Esplin S
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 122(3):571-8. PubMed ID: 23921867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and Validation of Predictive Models for Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in China.
Bi S; Zhang L; Chen J; Huang L; Zeng S; Jia J; Wen S; Cao Y; Wang S; Xu X; Ling F; Zhao X; Zhao Y; Zhu Q; Qi H; Zhang L; Li H; Du L; Wang Z; Chen D
Med Sci Monit; 2020 Dec; 26():e927681. PubMed ID: 33270607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
