BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27938328)

  • 1. Combining independent de novo assemblies optimizes the coding transcriptome for nonconventional model eukaryotic organisms.
    Cerveau N; Jackson DJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(1):525. PubMed ID: 27938328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inferring bona fide transfrags in RNA-Seq derived-transcriptome assemblies of non-model organisms.
    Mbandi SK; Hesse U; van Heusden P; Christoffels A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):58. PubMed ID: 25880035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal assembly strategies of transcriptome related to ploidies of eukaryotic organisms.
    He B; Zhao S; Chen Y; Cao Q; Wei C; Cheng X; Zhang Y
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 25759274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PARRoT- a homology-based strategy to quantify and compare RNA-sequencing from non-model organisms.
    Gan RC; Chen TW; Wu TH; Huang PJ; Lee CC; Yeh YM; Chiu CH; Huang HD; Tang P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):513. PubMed ID: 28155708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comprehensive evaluation of de novo transcriptome assembly programs and their effects on differential gene expression analysis.
    Wang S; Gribskov M
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(3):327-333. PubMed ID: 28172640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of nine popular de novo assemblers in microbial genome assembly.
    Forouzan E; Maleki MSM; Karkhane AA; Yakhchali B
    J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Dec; 143():32-37. PubMed ID: 28939423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges and advances for transcriptome assembly in non-model species.
    Ungaro A; Pech N; Martin JF; McCairns RJS; Mévy JP; Chappaz R; Gilles A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185020. PubMed ID: 28931057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. De Novo Plant Transcriptome Assembly and Annotation Using Illumina RNA-Seq Reads.
    Kerr SC; Gaiti F; Tanurdzic M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1933():265-275. PubMed ID: 30945191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assembly and annotation of a non-model gastropod (Nerita melanotragus) transcriptome: a comparison of de novo assemblers.
    Amin S; Prentis PJ; Gilding EK; Pavasovic A
    BMC Res Notes; 2014 Aug; 7():488. PubMed ID: 25084827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
    García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. De novo transcriptome assembly for a non-model species, the blood-sucking bug Triatoma brasiliensis, a vector of Chagas disease.
    Marchant A; Mougel F; Almeida C; Jacquin-Joly E; Costa J; Harry M
    Genetica; 2015 Apr; 143(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 25233990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-assembly, quality evaluation, and annotation of 678 microbial eukaryotic reference transcriptomes.
    Johnson LK; Alexander H; Brown CT
    Gigascience; 2019 Apr; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 30544207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A consensus-based ensemble approach to improve transcriptome assembly.
    Voshall A; Behera S; Li X; Yu XH; Kapil K; Deogun JS; Shanklin J; Cahoon EB; Moriyama EN
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Oct; 22(1):513. PubMed ID: 34674629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of De Novo Transcriptome Assemblers and k-mer Strategies Using the Killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus.
    Rana SB; Zadlock FJ; Zhang Z; Murphy WR; Bentivegna CS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153104. PubMed ID: 27054874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined de novo and genome guided assembly and annotation of the Pinus patula juvenile shoot transcriptome.
    Visser EA; Wegrzyn JL; Steenkmap ET; Myburg AA; Naidoo S
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Dec; 16():1057. PubMed ID: 26652261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing de novo transcriptome assembly tools in di- and autotetraploid non-model plant species.
    Madritsch S; Burg A; Sehr EM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):146. PubMed ID: 33752598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved annotation with de novo transcriptome assembly in four social amoeba species.
    Singh R; Lawal HM; Schilde C; Glöckner G; Barton GJ; Schaap P; Cole C
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):120. PubMed ID: 28143409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining transcriptome assemblies from multiple de novo assemblers in the allo-tetraploid plant Nicotiana benthamiana.
    Nakasugi K; Crowhurst R; Bally J; Waterhouse P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91776. PubMed ID: 24614631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimized sequencing depth and de novo assembler for deeply reconstructing the transcriptome of the tea plant, an economically important plant species.
    Li FD; Tong W; Xia EH; Wei CL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):553. PubMed ID: 31694521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Challenges and strategies in transcriptome assembly and differential gene expression quantification. A comprehensive in silico assessment of RNA-seq experiments.
    Vijay N; Poelstra JW; Künstner A; Wolf JB
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Feb; 22(3):620-34. PubMed ID: 22998089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.