These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27938339)

  • 1. Bayesian reversible-jump for epistasis analysis in genomic studies.
    Balestre M; de Souza CL
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Dec; 17(1):1012. PubMed ID: 27938339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of multiple QTL with epistatic effects under a mixed inheritance model in an outbred population.
    Narita A; Sasaki Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2004; 36(4):415-33. PubMed ID: 15231232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
    Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Connected populations for detecting quantitative trait loci and testing for epistasis: an application in maize.
    Blanc G; Charcosset A; Mangin B; Gallais A; Moreau L
    Theor Appl Genet; 2006 Jul; 113(2):206-24. PubMed ID: 16791688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An empirical Bayes method for estimating epistatic effects of quantitative trait loci.
    Xu S
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 17688503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mapping quantitative trait loci with epistatic effects.
    Yi N; Xu S
    Genet Res; 2002 Apr; 79(2):185-98. PubMed ID: 12073556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian Modeling for Epistasis Analysis Using Data-Driven Reversible Jump.
    Zuanetti DA; Milan LA
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(3):1495-1506. PubMed ID: 33301408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A two-step approach to map quantitative trait loci for meat quality in connected porcine F(2) crosses considering main and epistatic effects.
    Stratz P; Baes C; Rückert C; Preuss S; Bennewitz J
    Anim Genet; 2013 Feb; 44(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 22509991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci.
    Laurie C; Wang S; Carlini-Garcia LA; Zeng ZB
    BMC Genet; 2014 Nov; 15():112. PubMed ID: 25367219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The biological basis of epistasis between quantitative trait loci for flavone and 3-deoxyanthocyanin synthesis in maize (Zea mays L.).
    Mcmullen MD; Snook M; Lee EA; Byrne PF; Kross H; Musket TA; Houchins K; Coe EH
    Genome; 2001 Aug; 44(4):667-76. PubMed ID: 11550903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian model choice and search strategies for mapping interacting quantitative trait Loci.
    Yi N; Xu S; Allison DB
    Genetics; 2003 Oct; 165(2):867-83. PubMed ID: 14573494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling Epistasis in Genomic Selection.
    Jiang Y; Reif JC
    Genetics; 2015 Oct; 201(2):759-68. PubMed ID: 26219298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Including non-additive genetic effects in Bayesian methods for the prediction of genetic values based on genome-wide markers.
    Wittenburg D; Melzer N; Reinsch N
    BMC Genet; 2011 Aug; 12():74. PubMed ID: 21867519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods for genomic selection of traits with additive and epistatic genetic architectures.
    Howard R; Carriquiry AL; Beavis WD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Apr; 4(6):1027-46. PubMed ID: 24727289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying quantitative trait locus by genetic background interactions in association studies.
    Jannink JL
    Genetics; 2007 May; 176(1):553-61. PubMed ID: 17179077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mapping and validation of quantitative trait loci for resistance to Cercospora zeae-maydis infection in tropical maize (Zea mays L.).
    Pozar G; Butruille D; Silva HD; McCuddin ZP; Penna JC
    Theor Appl Genet; 2009 Feb; 118(3):553-64. PubMed ID: 18989654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A penalized maximum likelihood method for estimating epistatic effects of QTL.
    Zhang YM; Xu S
    Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Jul; 95(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 15931238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mapping quantitative trait loci with additive effects and additive x additive epistatic interactions for biomass yield, grain yield, and straw yield using a doubled haploid population of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).
    Li ZK; Jiang XL; Peng T; Shi CL; Han SX; Tian B; Zhu ZL; Tian JC
    Genet Mol Res; 2014 Feb; 13(1):1412-24. PubMed ID: 24634240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epistatic analysis of carcass characteristics in pigs reveals genomic interactions between quantitative trait loci attributable to additive and dominance genetic effects.
    Duthie C; Simm G; Doeschl-Wilson A; Kalm E; Knap PW; Roehe R
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jul; 88(7):2219-34. PubMed ID: 20228239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.