These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27938584)

  • 1. [Review of numerical simulation study of Stanford type B thoracic aortic dissection].
    Zeng YJ; Luo K; Fan JR; Zhu T
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 54(6):477-480. PubMed ID: 27938584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initial findings and potential applicability of computational simulation of the aorta in acute type B dissection.
    Cheng Z; Riga C; Chan J; Hamady M; Wood NB; Cheshire NJ; Xu Y; Gibbs RG
    J Vasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 57(2 Suppl):35S-43S. PubMed ID: 23336853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational Study of Anatomical Risk Factors in Idealized Models of Type B Aortic Dissection.
    Ben Ahmed S; Dillon-Murphy D; Figueroa CA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Dec; 52(6):736-745. PubMed ID: 27561609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The effects of pulsatile blood flow on thoracic aortic dissection].
    Yin J; Xiang Y; Li G
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 27(3):570-3. PubMed ID: 20649021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editor's Choice - Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulations of Aortic Dissection with Bench Validation.
    Chen HY; Peelukhana SV; Berwick ZC; Kratzberg J; Krieger JF; Roeder B; Chambers S; Kassab GS
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Nov; 52(5):589-595. PubMed ID: 27601219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of the entry and re-entry size in the aortic dissection: a two-way fluid-structure interaction simulation.
    Keramati H; Birgersson E; Ho JP; Kim S; Chua KJ; Leo HL
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Dec; 19(6):2643-2656. PubMed ID: 32621161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blood flow analysis of the aortic arch using computational fluid dynamics.
    Numata S; Itatani K; Kanda K; Doi K; Yamazaki S; Morimoto K; Manabe K; Ikemoto K; Yaku H
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1578-85. PubMed ID: 26792932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study.
    Shi Y; Zhu M; Chang Y; Qiao H; Liu Y
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 2):128. PubMed ID: 28155679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Potential of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation on Serial Monitoring of Hemodynamic Change in Type B Aortic Dissection.
    Yu SC; Liu W; Wong RH; Underwood M; Wang D
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2016 Aug; 39(8):1090-8. PubMed ID: 27169665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic determinants of aortic dissection propagation by 2D computational modeling: implications for endovascular stent-grafting.
    Chitsaz S; Azadani AN; Matthews PB; Chuter TA; Tseng EE; Ge L
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2012 Oct; 53(5):631-40. PubMed ID: 22820737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numerical simulation of two-phase non-Newtonian blood flow with fluid-structure interaction in aortic dissection.
    Qiao Y; Zeng Y; Ding Y; Fan J; Luo K; Zhu T
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 May; 22(6):620-630. PubMed ID: 30822150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Elevated Wall Shear Stress in Aortic Type B Dissection May Relate to Retrograde Aortic Type A Dissection: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Pilot Study.
    Osswald A; Karmonik C; Anderson JR; Rengier F; Karck M; Engelke J; Kallenbach K; Kotelis D; Partovi S; Böckler D; Ruhparwar A
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2017 Sep; 54(3):324-330. PubMed ID: 28716447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigations into the Potential of Using Open Source CFD to Analyze the Differences in Hemodynamic Parameters for Aortic Dissections (Healthy versus Stanford Type A and B).
    Takeda R; Sato F; Yokoyama H; Sasaki K; Oshima N; Kuroda A; Takashima H; Li C; Honda S; Kamiya H
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Feb; 79():310-323. PubMed ID: 34648855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Numerical simulation study of type B aortic dissection using patient-specific reverse engineering and fluid-structure interaction].
    Zhang T; Guo HB; Li WH; Li W; Zhang XM; Li QL; Zhang XM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 99(2):142-147. PubMed ID: 30669754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro phantom study on the influence of tear size and configuration on the hemodynamics of the lumina in chronic type B aortic dissections.
    Rudenick PA; Bijnens BH; García-Dorado D; Evangelista A
    J Vasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 57(2):464-474.e5. PubMed ID: 23141674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Geometric Accuracy at the Proximal Landing Zone on Simulation Results for Thoracic Endovascular Repair Patients.
    Qiu Y; Dong S; Liu Z; Yuan D; Zheng T
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2020 Dec; 11(6):679-688. PubMed ID: 33145725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-modality image-based computational analysis of haemodynamics in aortic dissection.
    Dillon-Murphy D; Noorani A; Nordsletten D; Figueroa CA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Aug; 15(4):857-76. PubMed ID: 26416312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pulsatile hemodynamics in patient-specific thoracic aortic dissection models constructed from computed tomography angiography.
    Long Ko JK; Liu RW; Ma D; Shi L; Ho Yu SC; Wang D
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2017; 25(2):233-245. PubMed ID: 28234275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic review of computational fluid dynamics in type B aortic dissection.
    Sun Z; Chaichana T
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 May; 210():28-31. PubMed ID: 26922709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aortic dissection simulation models for clinical support: fluid-structure interaction vs. rigid wall models.
    Alimohammadi M; Sherwood JM; Karimpour M; Agu O; Balabani S; Díaz-Zuccarini V
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Apr; 14():34. PubMed ID: 25881252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.