BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27939540)

  • 1. Including nonadditive genetic effects in mating programs to maximize dairy farm profitability.
    Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Feb; 100(2):1203-1222. PubMed ID: 27939540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mating programs including genomic relationships and dominance effects.
    Sun C; VanRaden PM; O'Connell JR; Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):8014-23. PubMed ID: 24119810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic dissection of repeatability considering additive and nonadditive genetic effects for semen production traits in beef and dairy bulls.
    Nagai R; Kinukawa M; Watanabe T; Ogino A; Kurogi K; Adachi K; Satoh M; Uemoto Y
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Sep; 100(9):. PubMed ID: 35860946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
    Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Additive and nonadditive genetic variances for milk yield, fertility, and lifetime performance traits of dairy cattle.
    Fuerst C; Sölkner J
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Apr; 77(4):1114-25. PubMed ID: 8201046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved dairy cattle mating plans at herd level using genomic information.
    Bérodier M; Berg P; Meuwissen T; Boichard D; Brochard M; Ducrocq V
    Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100016. PubMed ID: 33516018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Production traits of Holstein cattle: estimation of nonadditive genetic variance components and inbreeding depression.
    Miglior F; Burnside EB; Kennedy BW
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 May; 78(5):1174-80. PubMed ID: 7622728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Additive and nonadditive genetic variance in female fertility of Holsteins.
    Hoeschele I
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 May; 74(5):1743-52. PubMed ID: 1880275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of nonadditive genetic effects in the estimation of breeding values for fertility and correlated traits.
    Wall E; Brotherstone S; Kearney JF; Woolliams JA; Coffey MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jan; 88(1):376-85. PubMed ID: 15591402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Simianer H; Willam A
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):382-91. PubMed ID: 19109296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel strategies to minimize progeny inbreeding while maximizing genetic gain using genomic information.
    Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):377-88. PubMed ID: 22192217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
    Reiner-Benaim A; Ezra E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2892-2904. PubMed ID: 28189326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of nonadditive effects in yearling weight of tropical beef cattle.
    Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Vitezica ZG; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4028-4034. PubMed ID: 30032181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of computerized mate selection programs to control inbreeding of Holstein and Jersey cattle in the next generation.
    Weigel KA; Lin SW
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Apr; 83(4):822-8. PubMed ID: 10791799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-random mating for selection with restricted rates of inbreeding and overlapping generations.
    Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 11929623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
    Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
    Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimising clonal performance in sugarcane: leveraging non-additive effects via mate-allocation strategies.
    Yadav S; Ross EM; Wei X; Powell O; Hivert V; Hickey LT; Atkin F; Deomano E; Aitken KS; Voss-Fels KP; Hayes BJ
    Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1260517. PubMed ID: 38023905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of full sibs on additive breeding values under the dominance model for stature in United States Holsteins.
    Varona L; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Apr; 81(4):1126-35. PubMed ID: 9594402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.