These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27940257)
1. Variables influencing the efficiency and interpretation of reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR): An empirical study using Bacteriophage MS2. Miranda JA; Steward GF J Virol Methods; 2017 Mar; 241():1-10. PubMed ID: 27940257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of bacteriophage MS2 as an internal control in viral reverse transcription-PCR assays. Dreier J; Störmer M; Kleesiek K J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 43(9):4551-7. PubMed ID: 16145106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of various commercial reverse transcriptases based on armored HIV RNA. Okello JB; Rodriguez L; Poinar D; Bos K; Okwi AL; Bimenya GS; Sewankambo NK; Henry KR; Kuch M; Poinar HN PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13931. PubMed ID: 21085668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Potential pitfalls in the accuracy of analysis of natural sense-antisense RNA pairs by reverse transcription-PCR. Haddad F; Qin AX; Giger JM; Guo H; Baldwin KM BMC Biotechnol; 2007 May; 7():21. PubMed ID: 17480233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Higher random oligo concentration improves reverse transcription yield of cDNA from bioptic tissues and quantitative RT-PCR reliability. Nardon E; Donada M; Bonin S; Dotti I; Stanta G Exp Mol Pathol; 2009 Oct; 87(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 19619529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. RT-Bst: an integrated approach for reverse transcription and enrichment of cDNA from viral RNA. Kabir MS; Clements MO; Kimmitt PT Br J Biomed Sci; 2015; 72(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 25906484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability of the reverse transcription step: practical implications. Bustin S; Dhillon HS; Kirvell S; Greenwood C; Parker M; Shipley GL; Nolan T Clin Chem; 2015 Jan; 61(1):202-12. PubMed ID: 25361949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of strand-specific real-time RT-PCR for the analysis of SCRV transcription and replication dynamics. Lin Q; Zhao Y; Fu X; Liu L; Liang H; Niu Y; Chen X; Huang Z; Lin L; Li N Microb Pathog; 2019 Apr; 129():146-151. PubMed ID: 30731189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-time fluorogenic reverse transcription-PCR assays for detection of bacteriophage MS2. O'Connell KP; Bucher JR; Anderson PE; Cao CJ; Khan AS; Gostomski MV; Valdes JJ Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Jan; 72(1):478-83. PubMed ID: 16391081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Properties of the reverse transcription reaction in mRNA quantification. Ståhlberg A; Håkansson J; Xian X; Semb H; Kubista M Clin Chem; 2004 Mar; 50(3):509-15. PubMed ID: 14726469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technique for strand-specific gene-expression analysis and monitoring of primer-independent cDNA synthesis in reverse transcription. Feng L; Lintula S; Ho TH; Anastasina M; Paju A; Haglund C; Stenman UH; Hotakainen K; Orpana A; Kainov D; Stenman J Biotechniques; 2012 Apr; 52(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 22482442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and evaluation of a simple and effective RT-qPCR inhibitory assay for detection of the efficacy of compounds towards HIV reverse transcriptase. Marino-Merlo F; Frezza C; Papaianni E; Valletta E; Mastino A; Macchi B Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 101(22):8249-8258. PubMed ID: 28963576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Substantial performance discrepancies among commercially available kits for reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction: a systematic comparative investigator-driven approach. Sieber MW; Recknagel P; Glaser F; Witte OW; Bauer M; Claus RA; Frahm C Anal Biochem; 2010 Jun; 401(2):303-11. PubMed ID: 20226159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quick assessment of influenza a virus infectivity with a long-range reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. Nakaya Y; Fukuda T; Ashiba H; Yasuura M; Fujimaki M BMC Infect Dis; 2020 Aug; 20(1):585. PubMed ID: 32762666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an improved product enhanced reverse transcriptase assay. Chang A; Ostrove JM; Bird RE J Virol Methods; 1997 Apr; 65(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 9128861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian modeling of reproducibility and robustness of RNA reverse transcription and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Lindén J; Ranta J; Pohjanvirta R Anal Biochem; 2012 Sep; 428(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 22713341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reverse transcription using random pentadecamer primers increases yield and quality of resulting cDNA. Stangegaard M; Dufva IH; Dufva M Biotechniques; 2006 May; 40(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 16708763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of Armored RNA as a multi-purpose internal control for RT-PCR. Stevenson J; Hymas W; Hillyard D J Virol Methods; 2008 Jun; 150(1-2):73-6. PubMed ID: 18395804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimisation of reverse transcription can improve the sensitivity of RT-PCR for detection of classical swine fever virus. Podgórska K; Stadejek T Acta Vet Hung; 2010 Jun; 58(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 20460224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]