139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27940494)
1. Evaluation of Imaging Dose From Different Image Guided Systems During Head and Neck Radiotherapy: A Phantom Study.
Cheng CS; Jong WL; Ung NM; Wong JHD
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jul; 175(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 27940494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for the Varian cone beam computed tomography system.
Cheng HC; Wu VW; Liu ES; Kwong DL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):291-300. PubMed ID: 20932676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorbed dose measurements for kV-cone beam computed tomography in image-guided radiation therapy.
Hioki K; Araki F; Ohno T; Nakaguchi Y; Tomiyama Y
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Dec; 59(23):7297-313. PubMed ID: 25383908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of CBCT reconstruction and calibration for radiotherapy planning in the head and neck region - a phantom study.
Elstrøm UV; Olsen SR; Muren LP; Petersen JB; Grau C
Acta Oncol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):1114-24. PubMed ID: 24975372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.
Kan MW; Leung LH; Wong W; Lam N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 17980510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging doses and secondary cancer risk from kilovoltage cone-beam CT in radiation therapy.
Kim DW; Chung WK; Yoon M
Health Phys; 2013 May; 104(5):499-503. PubMed ID: 23532078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of the radiation dose from cone-beam CT for image-guided radiotherapy: A comparison of methodologies.
Buckley JG; Wilkinson D; Malaroda A; Metcalfe P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 29265684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Linac-based on-board imaging feasibility and the dosimetric consequences of head roll in head-and-neck IMRT plans.
Kim GY; Pawlicki T; Le QT; Luxton G
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 18262130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of lens absorbed dose with Cone Beam IGRT procedures.
Palomo R; Pujades MC; Gimeno-Olmos J; Carmona V; Lliso F; Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
J Radiol Prot; 2015 Dec; 35(4):N33-41. PubMed ID: 26457404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose calculation accuracy of different image value to density tables for cone-beam CT planning in head & neck and pelvic localizations.
Barateau A; Garlopeau C; Cugny A; De Figueiredo BH; Dupin C; Caron J; Antoine M
Phys Med; 2015 Mar; 31(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 25595131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Organ and effective doses from verification techniques in image-guided radiotherapy.
Dufek V; Horakova I; Novak L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):277-80. PubMed ID: 21816726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental validation of a kV source model and dose computation method for CBCT imaging in an anthropomorphic phantom.
Poirier Y; Tambasco M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):155-171. PubMed ID: 27455477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the stability of image-quality parameters of Varian on-board imaging (OBI) and EPID imaging systems.
Stanley DN; Papanikolaou N; Gutierrez AN
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5088. PubMed ID: 26103178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Monte Carlo study to investigate the feasibility of an on-board SPECT/spectral-CT/CBCT imager for medical linear accelerator.
Wang H; Nie K; Chang J; Kuang Y
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5112-5122. PubMed ID: 32681649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posterior kV-CBCT scanning of the head and neck region minimizes doses to critical organs with sustained image quality.
Khamfongkhruea C; Utapom K; Munsing S; Suttiprapha S; Tannanonta C; Yabsantia S
Phys Med; 2015 Jul; 31(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 25921330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the verification performance and radiation dose between ExacTrac x-ray system and On-Board Imager-A phantom study.
Wu VW; Ho YY; Tang YS; Lam PW; Yeung HK; Lee SW
Med Dosim; 2019 Spring; 44(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 29395461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linear Accelerator-Based Radiotherapy Simulation Using On-Board Kilovoltage Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for 3-Dimensional Volumetric Planning and Rapid Treatment in the Palliative Setting.
Dyer BA; Nair CK; Deardorff CE; Wright CL; Perks JR; Rao SS
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 18():1533033819865623. PubMed ID: 31370760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An investigation of image guidance dose for breast radiotherapy.
Alvarado R; Booth JT; Bromley RM; Gustafsson HB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4085. PubMed ID: 23652243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Set-up errors and planning margins in planar and CBCT image-guided radiotherapy using three different imaging systems: A clinical study for prostate and head-and-neck cancer.
Dzierma Y; Beyhs M; Palm J; Niewald M; Bell K; Nuesken F; Licht N; Rübe C
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1055-1059. PubMed ID: 26476789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
