These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2794247)

  • 1. Discrimination of rising and falling simulated single-formant frequency transitions: practice and transition duration effects.
    Elliott LL; Hammer MA; Scholl ME; Carrell TD; Wasowicz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Sep; 86(3):945-53. PubMed ID: 2794247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrimination of formant transition onset frequency: psychoacoustic cues at short, moderate, and long durations.
    Porter RJ; Cullen JK; Collins MJ; Jackson DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1298-308. PubMed ID: 1939896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age differences in discrimination of simulated single-formant frequency transitions.
    Elliott LL; Hammer MA; Scholl ME; Wasowicz JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 2762106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency and duration discrimination of short first-formant speechlike transitions.
    van Wieringen A; Pols LC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):502-11. PubMed ID: 8120261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrimination of second-format-like frequency transitions.
    Elliott LL; Hammer MA; Carrell T
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1881761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with two formants.
    Lyzenga J; Horst JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Nov; 104(5):2956-66. PubMed ID: 9821340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with a single formant.
    Lyzenga J; Horst JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1755-67. PubMed ID: 9301053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intensity just-noticeable differences at equal-loudness levels in normal and pathological ears.
    Stillman JA; Zwislocki JJ; Zhang M; Cefaratti LK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):425-34. PubMed ID: 8423259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationships of intensity discrimination to sensation and loudness levels: dependence on sound frequency.
    Ozimek E; Zwislocki JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3304-20. PubMed ID: 8914312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation.
    Demany L; Semal C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1295-301. PubMed ID: 2708671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Just noticeable differences for intensity and their relation to loudness.
    Johnson JH; Turner CW; Zwislocki JJ; Margolis RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):983-91. PubMed ID: 8445133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory discrimination in a sound-producing electric fish (Pollimyrus): tone frequency and click-rate difference detection.
    Marvit P; Crawford JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1819-25. PubMed ID: 11051508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prioritization of voice fundamental frequency or formants in listeners' assessments of speaker size, masculinity, and attractiveness.
    Pisanski K; Rendall D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2201-12. PubMed ID: 21476675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Formant transition duration and speech recognition in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Smith SJ; Aldridge PL; Stewart SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2822-5. PubMed ID: 9165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intensity discrimination in forward masking.
    Zeng FG; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Aug; 92(2 Pt 1):782-7. PubMed ID: 1506532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrimination of frequency transitions by human infants.
    Aslin RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Aug; 86(2):582-90. PubMed ID: 2768673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intensity discrimination determined with two paradigms in normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Turner CW; Zwislocki JJ; Filion PR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jul; 86(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 2754103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceived auditory continuity with alternately rising and falling frequency transitions.
    Dannenbring GL
    Can J Psychol; 1976 Jun; 30(2):99-114. PubMed ID: 974899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The verbal transformation effect and the perceptual organization of speech: influence of formant transitions and F0-contour continuity.
    Stachurski M; Summers RJ; Roberts B
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():22-31. PubMed ID: 25620314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychoacoustical evaluation of PSOLA. II. Double-formant stimuli and the role of vocal perturbation.
    Kortekaas RW; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):522-35. PubMed ID: 9921675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.