These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27942967)

  • 1. Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: a comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques.
    Erdem S; Campbell D
    Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 18(9):1107-1123. PubMed ID: 27942967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data.
    Potoglou D; Burge P; Flynn T; Netten A; Malley J; Forder J; Brazier JE
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 May; 72(10):1717-27. PubMed ID: 21530040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single-best discrete choice experiments, should we use best-worst, best-best or ranking for preference elicitation?
    Huls SPI; Lancsar E; Donkers B; Ride J
    Health Econ; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2630-2647. PubMed ID: 36102864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
    Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best-worst discrete choice experiments in health.
    Krucien N; Sicsic J; Ryan M
    Health Econ; 2019 Apr; 28(4):572-586. PubMed ID: 30761661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.
    Armeni P; Meregaglia M; Borsoi L; Callea G; Torbica A; Benazzo F; Tarricone R
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):886-900. PubMed ID: 37837325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Empirical Comparison of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling to Estimate Stakeholders' Risk Tolerance for Hip Replacement Surgery.
    van Dijk JD; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Marshall DA; IJzerman MJ
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 27325322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Caregiver preferences for emerging duchenne muscular dystrophy treatments: a comparison of best-worst scaling and conjoint analysis.
    Hollin IL; Peay HL; Bridges JF
    Patient; 2015 Feb; 8(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 25523316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.
    Whitty JA; Walker R; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90635. PubMed ID: 24759637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.
    Whitty JA; Oliveira Gonçalves AS
    Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):301-317. PubMed ID: 29177797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parental preferences for vesicoureteral reflux treatment: Profile case best-worst scaling.
    Dionise ZR; Gonzalez JM; Garcia-Roig ML; Kirsch AJ; Scales CD; Wiener JS; Purves JT; Routh JC
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Feb; 17(1):86.e1-86.e9. PubMed ID: 33309608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is Best-Worst Scaling Suitable for Health State Valuation? A Comparison with Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Krucien N; Watson V; Ryan M
    Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 26(12):e1-e16. PubMed ID: 27917560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of alternative preference elicitation methods in complex discrete choice experiments.
    Yoo HI; Doiron D
    J Health Econ; 2013 Dec; 32(6):1166-79. PubMed ID: 24144729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eliciting Preferences in Dentistry with Multiattribute Stated Preference Methods: A Systematic Review.
    Barber S; Pavitt S; Khambay B; Bekker H; Meads D
    JDR Clin Trans Res; 2018 Oct; 3(4):326-335. PubMed ID: 30931788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the Self-Reported Acceptability of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    Li F; Liu S; Gu Y; Li S; Tao Y; Wei Y; Chen Y
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2024; 18():1803-1813. PubMed ID: 39229369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of information and deliberation on the consistency of preferences for prioritization in health care - evidence from discrete choice experiments undertaken alongside citizens' juries.
    Whitty JA; Littlejohns P; Ratcliffe J; Rixon K; Wilson A; Kendall E; Burton P; Chalkidou K; Scuffham PA
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1237-1249. PubMed ID: 37738383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: methods and an application.
    Lancsar E; Louviere J; Donaldson C; Currie G; Burgess L
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Jan; 76(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 23159304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature.
    Brett Hauber A; Fairchild AO; Reed Johnson F
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Aug; 11(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 23637054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical Investigation of Ranking vs Best-Worst Scaling Generated Preferences for Attributes of Quality of Life: One and the Same or Differentiable?
    Ratcliffe J; Kaambwa B; Hutchinson C; Lancsar E
    Patient; 2020 Jun; 13(3):307-315. PubMed ID: 31930462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.
    Schatz NK; Fabiano GA; Cunningham CE; dosReis S; Waschbusch DA; Jerome S; Lupas K; Morris KL
    Patient; 2015 Dec; 8(6):483-97. PubMed ID: 25644223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.