These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27943121)

  • 1. The effects of the binocular disparity differences between targets and maskers on visual search.
    Gao YY; Schneider B; Li L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):459-472. PubMed ID: 27943121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breaking camouflage: binocular disparity reduces contrast masking in natural images.
    Wardle SG; Cass J; Brooks KR; Alais D
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):. PubMed ID: 21196512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Swaminathan J; Roverud E; Clayton KK; Best V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):132. PubMed ID: 27475139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binocularity and visual search-Revisited.
    Zou B; Utochkin IS; Liu Y; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):473-483. PubMed ID: 27900725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective spatial attention modulates bottom-up informational masking of speech.
    Carlile S; Corkhill C
    Sci Rep; 2015 Mar; 5():8662. PubMed ID: 25727100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selectivity of cyclopean masking for the spatial frequency of binocular disparity modulation.
    Cobo-Lewis AB; Yeh YY
    Vision Res; 1994 Mar; 34(5):607-20. PubMed ID: 8160380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 'uniqueness constraint' and binocular masking.
    McKee SP; Bravo MJ; Smallman HS; Legge GE
    Perception; 1995; 24(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 7617418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of shape and location on temporal masking of spatial vibrotactile patterns.
    Horner DT
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1255-65. PubMed ID: 9401459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related inhibitory deficit, or lack of familiarity benefit? Evidence from letter identification among visual distractors.
    Rabaglia CD; Schneider BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):542-65. PubMed ID: 26542401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Isolating informational masking in both pure and complex tone sequences.
    Calcus A; Agus T; Kolinsky R; Colin C; Deltenre P
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25401380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry share common perceptual dynamics.
    van Boxtel JJ; van Ee R; Erkelens CJ
    J Vis; 2007 Nov; 7(14):3.1-11. PubMed ID: 18217798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.
    Bonino AY; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4446. PubMed ID: 25669256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous masking additivity for short Gaussian-shaped tones: spectral effects.
    Laback B; Necciari T; Balazs P; Savel S; Ystad S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1160-71. PubMed ID: 23927115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in speech-on-speech masking are correlated with cognitive and visual task performance.
    Byrne AJ; Conroy C; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Oct; 154(4):2137-2153. PubMed ID: 37800988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monaural speech intelligibility and detection in maskers with varying amounts of spectro-temporal speech features.
    Schubotz W; Brand T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):524. PubMed ID: 27475175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dichoptic visual masking reveals that early binocular neurons exhibit weak interocular suppression: implications for binocular vision and visual awareness.
    Macknik SL; Martinez-Conde S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1049-59. PubMed ID: 15298791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.