116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2794618)
21. Reassessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma.
Kaku T; Tsuruchi N; Tsukamoto N; Hirakawa T; Kamura T; Nakano H
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):979-82. PubMed ID: 7970481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the extension of uterine cervical cancer].
Matsubara M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Oct; 45(10):1115-22. PubMed ID: 8245590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A retrospective review of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the extent of myometrial infiltration for patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Rieck GC; Bulman J; Whitaker R; Leeson SC
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Nov; 25(8):765-8. PubMed ID: 16368581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Role of X-ray CT and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological malignant tumor].
Suzuki M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 41(8):942-52. PubMed ID: 2809344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of deep endometrial invasion for patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Hwang JH; Lee NW; Lee KW; Lee JK
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 49(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 19780740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Stage IIIa endometrial carcinoma: MR findings].
Nobusawa H; Gokan T; Hashimoto T; Matsui S; Munechika H; Hishida T; Kushima M; Tahara R; Saitoh Y; Yanaihara T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Apr; 56(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 8692653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for staging endometrial cancer. A prospective study of 100 cases at the Dorset Cancer Centre.
Ortashi O; Jain S; Emannuel O; Henry R; Wood A; Evans J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Apr; 137(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 17537566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Evaluation of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer by magnetic resonance imaging].
Matsuura Y; Kashimura M; Shinohara M; Sakamoto C
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Jul; 44(7):787-92. PubMed ID: 1500803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer by progesterone-challenge test, CT scan, magnetic resonance imaging, PET scan and intraoperative visual evaluation and Frozen section].
Ivanov C
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2009; 48(6):14-8. PubMed ID: 20225491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Natural killer cell activity in stage I endometrial carcinoma: correlation with nuclear grading, myometrial invasion, and immunoreactivity of proliferating cell nuclear antigen.
Garzetti GG; Ciavattini A; Goteri G; Tranquilli AL; Muzzioli M; Fabris N; De Nictolis M; Romanini C
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Oct; 55(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 7525425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical value of intraoperative gross examination in endometrial cancer.
Franchi M; Ghezzi F; Melpignano M; Cherchi PL; Scarabelli C; Apolloni C; Zanaboni F
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Mar; 76(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 10684710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic significance of gross myometrial invasion with endometrial cancer.
Larson DM; Connor GP; Broste SK; Krawisz BR; Johnson KK
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 88(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 8752246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pitfalls in staging uterine neoplasm with imaging: a review.
Kinkel K
Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 16333697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prospective evaluation of prognostic significance of the tumor-free distance from uterine serosa in surgically staged endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Schwab KV; O'Malley DM; Fowler JM; Copeland LJ; Cohn DE
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jan; 112(1):146-9. PubMed ID: 18937970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Endometrial adenocarcinoma involving adenomyosis without true myometrial invasion is characterized by frequent preceding estrogen therapy, low histologic grades, and excellent prognosis.
Mittal KR; Barwick KW
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 May; 49(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 8504988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study.
Boronow RC; Morrow CP; Creasman WT; Disaia PJ; Silverberg SG; Miller A; Blessing JA
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jun; 63(6):825-32. PubMed ID: 6728365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of MR imaging for the prediction of myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma.
Chung HH; Kang SB; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Lee HP
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Mar; 104(3):654-9. PubMed ID: 17095081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [An analysis of prognostic significance of new FIGO staging (1989) of endometrial cancer].
Nishiya M; Sakuragi N; Tanaka T; Ohkohchi T; Takeda N; Tsumura N; Hirahatake K; Satoh C; Fujimoto S
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Apr; 43(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 2066616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MR imaging of uterine carcinoma: correlation with clinical and pathologic findings.
Posniak HV; Olson MC; Dudiak CM; Castelli MJ; Dolan J; Wisniewski RA; Isaacs JH; Sharma SK; Bychkov V
Radiographics; 1990 Jan; 10(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 2296693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the extent of endometrial carcinoma].
Takahashi K; Yoshioka M; Kosuge H; Iizuka Y; Musha T; Yamauchi I; Yoshimura Y; Nakamura Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Jul; 47(7):647-54. PubMed ID: 7636336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
