These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2794700)

  • 21. Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study.
    Siriwat PP; Jarabak JR
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Apr; 55(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 3874569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The morphologic structure of the openbite in adult Taiwanese.
    Kao CT; Chen FM; Lin TY; Peng CH; Huang TH
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 8805915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A morphological study of anterior protrusion in Japanese with x-ray cephalometry].
    Nomura N
    Zasshi Tokyo Ika Daigaku; 1967 Mar; 25(1):7-24. PubMed ID: 5624408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of skeletal maturity of children with cleft palate in terms of healthy children by the CVM method.
    Flieger R; Kopczyński P; Matthews-Brzozowska T
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 25923093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determination of craniofacial growth in patients with untreated Class III malocclusions and anterior crossbites using the centroid method.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 19549679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Lau JW; Hägg U
    Br Dent J; 1999 Feb; 186(4 Spec No):188-90. PubMed ID: 10205956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
    Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The cervical vertebrae maturation (CVM) method cannot predict craniofacial growth in girls with Class II malocclusion.
    Engel TP; Renkema AM; Katsaros C; Pazera P; Pandis N; Fudalej PS
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25667036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Morphometric analysis of mandibular growth in skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Chang JZ; Chen YJ; Chang FH; Yao JC; Liu PH; Chang CH; Lan WH
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2006 Apr; 105(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 16618612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of craniofacial growth in a case of transverse facial cleft.
    Kirbschus A; Gesch D; Kaduk W; Gedrange T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 May; 67(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 16736122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ethnicity and skeletal Class III morphology: a pubertal growth analysis using thin-plate spline analysis.
    Alkhamrah B; Terada K; Yamaki M; Ali IM; Hanada K
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(4):243-54. PubMed ID: 12390002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variability of the cranial and dental phenotype in Williams syndrome.
    Axelsson S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (170):3-67. PubMed ID: 15762376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relationship of the functional oropharynx to craniofacial morphology.
    Trenouth MJ; Timms DJ
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 10515139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Examination of craniofacial morphology in 10-month to 5-year-old children with cleft lip and palate.
    Casal C; Rivera A; Rubio G; Sentís-Vilalta J; Alonso A; Gay-Escoda C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 9431466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [A roentgeno-cephalometric study on the craniofacial morphology and growth change of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion by using Ricketts analysis].
    Tokuda N
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1987 Dec; 46(4):650-72. PubMed ID: 3506574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An estimation of craniofacial growth in the untreated Class III female with anterior crossbite.
    Miyajima K; McNamara JA; Sana M; Murata S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Oct; 112(4):425-34. PubMed ID: 9345155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Facial morphology and growth from 10 to 14 years of age in children presenting Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion: a comparative roentgenographic cephalometric study.
    Rothstein TL
    Am J Orthod; 1971 Dec; 60(6):619-20. PubMed ID: 5288849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Study of dento-maxillo-facial growth and development on anterior deep bite with linguoversion of upper incisors during permanent dentition].
    Lin JX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1992 Jan; 27(1):27-30, 62. PubMed ID: 1499393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Craniofacial morphology of children with Williams syndrome.
    Mass E; Belostoky L
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 May; 30(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 8338868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Craniofacial morphology of Japanese girls with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Ishii N; Deguchi T; Hunt NP
    J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 11504898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.