These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2795026)

  • 1. In vitro initial fixation of porous-coated acetabular total hip components. A biomechanical comparative study.
    Lachiewicz PF; Suh PB; Gilbert JA
    J Arthroplasty; 1989 Sep; 4(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 2795026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The initial stability of uncemented acetabular components.
    Curtis MJ; Jinnah RH; Wilson VD; Hungerford DS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1992 May; 74(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 1587880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Press-fit stability of uncemented hemispheric acetabular components: a comparison of three porous coating systems.
    Markel DC; Hora N; Grimm M
    Int Orthop; 2002; 26(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 12078880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cadaver study of acetabular cup mobility in the healthy hip and prosthesis by monopodal pressure simulation ].
    Vandenbussche E; Massin P; Augereau B; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1999 May; 85(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 10392414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial stability of cementless acetabular cups: press-fit and screw fixation interaction--an in vitro biomechanical study.
    Tabata T; Kaku N; Hara K; Tsumura H
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Apr; 25(3):497-502. PubMed ID: 25421640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical stability of porous-coated acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty.
    Stiehl JB; MacMillan E; Skrade DA
    J Arthroplasty; 1991 Dec; 6(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 1770365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acetabular micromotion as a measure of initial implant stability in primary hip arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of different methods of initial acetabular component fixation.
    Perona PG; Lawrence J; Paprosky WG; Patwardhan AG; Sartori M
    J Arthroplasty; 1992 Dec; 7(4):537-47. PubMed ID: 1479374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fixed-angle screws vs standard screws in acetabular prosthesis fixation: a cadaveric biomechanical study.
    Hugate RR; Dickey ID; Chen Q; Wood CM; Sim FH; Rock MG
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):806-14. PubMed ID: 18639433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of acetabular stability in uncemented prostheses.
    Clarke HJ; Jinnah RH; Warden KE; Cox QG; Curtis MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1991 Dec; 6(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 1770370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial stability of porous coated acetabular implants. The effect of screw placement, screw tightness, defect type, and oversize implants.
    Hadjari MH; Hollis JM; Hofmann OE; Flahiff CM; Nelson CL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Oct; (307):117-23. PubMed ID: 7924023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial stability of press-fit acetabular components under rotational forces.
    Fehring KA; Owen JR; Kurdin AA; Wayne JS; Jiranek WA
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):1038-42. PubMed ID: 24238907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screw-augmented fixation of acetabular components. A mechanical model to determine optimal screw placement.
    Stranne SK; Callaghan JJ; Elder SH; Glisson RR; Seaber AV
    J Arthroplasty; 1991 Dec; 6(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 1770366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A pilot trial comparing the tear-out behavior in screw-sockets and cemented polyethylene acetabular components - a cadaveric study.
    Möbius R; Schleifenbaum S; Grunert R; Löffler S; Werner M; Prietzel T; Hammer N
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Oct; 102(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 27478000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polyaxial locking and compression screws improve construct stiffness of acetabular cup fixation: a biomechanical study.
    Milne LP; Kop AM; Kuster MS
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):1043-51. PubMed ID: 24360790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of initial surface apposition in porous-coated acetabular components.
    Schwartz JT; Engh CA; Forte MR; Kukita Y; Grandia SK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Aug; (293):174-87. PubMed ID: 8339478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. Radiographic analysis of eighty-three primary hip replacements at a minimum of five years.
    Schmalzried TP; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Sep; 74(8):1130-9. PubMed ID: 1400541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel technique for the removal of well-fixed, porous-coated acetabular components with spike fixation.
    Della Valle CJ; Stuchin SA
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8):1081-3. PubMed ID: 11740769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric titanium porous coated acetabular component without screw fixation.
    Dorr LD; Wan Z; Cohen J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jun; (351):158-68. PubMed ID: 9646758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strength of initial mechanical fixation of screw ring acetabular components.
    Kody MH; Kabo JM; Markolf KL; Dorey FJ; Amstutz HC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Aug; (257):146-53. PubMed ID: 2379353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation of different fixation principles.
    Thanner J
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1999 Aug; 286():1-41. PubMed ID: 10572504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.