257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27951459)
1. FDG PET/MR in initial staging of sarcoma: Initial experience and comparison with conventional imaging.
Platzek I; Beuthien-Baumann B; Schramm G; Maus J; Laniado M; Kotzerke J; van den Hoff J; Schuler M
Clin Imaging; 2017; 42():126-132. PubMed ID: 27951459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Value of FDG PET/CT in Patient Management and Outcome of Skeletal and Soft Tissue Sarcomas.
Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus C; Hafezi-Nejad N; Taghipour M; Subramaniam RM
PET Clin; 2015 Jul; 10(3):375-93. PubMed ID: 26099673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [18F-FDG-PET-CT in soft tissue sarcomas: when to image?].
Rodríguez-Alfonso B; Mucientes Rasilla J; Mitjavila Casanovas M; Cardona Arboniés J; Cubedo R
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2014; 33(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 24094372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pediatric bone sarcoma: diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT versus conventional imaging for initial staging and follow-up.
Quartuccio N; Fox J; Kuk D; Wexler LH; Baldari S; Cistaro A; Schöder H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 25539251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of
Elmanzalawy A; Vali R; Chavhan GB; Gupta AA; Omarkhail Y; Amirabadi A; Shammas A
Pediatr Radiol; 2020 Feb; 50(2):252-260. PubMed ID: 31628508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speeding up PET/MR for cancer staging of children and young adults.
Aghighi M; Pisani LJ; Sun Z; Klenk C; Madnawat H; Fineman SL; Advani R; Von Eyben R; Owen D; Quon A; Moseley M; Daldrup-Link HE
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4239-4248. PubMed ID: 27048532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What is the diagnostic performance of 18-FDG-PET/MR compared to PET/CT for the N- and M- staging of breast cancer?
Botsikas D; Bagetakos I; Picarra M; Da Cunha Afonso Barisits AC; Boudabbous S; Montet X; Lam GT; Mainta I; Kalovidouri A; Becker M
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1787-1798. PubMed ID: 30267154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Necrosis on FDG PET/CT correlates with prognosis and mortality in sarcomas.
Rakheja R; Makis W; Tulbah R; Skamene S; Holcroft C; Nahal A; Turcotte R; Hickeson M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 201(1):170-7. PubMed ID: 23789672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positron emission tomography for staging of pediatric sarcoma patients: results of a prospective multicenter trial.
Völker T; Denecke T; Steffen I; Misch D; Schönberger S; Plotkin M; Ruf J; Furth C; Stöver B; Hautzel H; Henze G; Amthauer H
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Dec; 25(34):5435-41. PubMed ID: 18048826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone and soft-tissue sarcoma: preoperative staging with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and conventional imaging.
Tateishi U; Yamaguchi U; Seki K; Terauchi T; Arai Y; Kim EE
Radiology; 2007 Dec; 245(3):839-47. PubMed ID: 18024454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Primary Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas by 18F-FDG-PET.
Younis MH; Abu-Hijleh HA; Aldahamsheh OO; Abualruz A; Thalib L
Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(5):465-472. PubMed ID: 31887730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contemporary imaging in sarcoma.
Landa J; Schwartz LH
Oncologist; 2009 Oct; 14(10):1021-38. PubMed ID: 19789392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. F-18 FDG-PET for detection of osseous metastatic disease and staging, restaging, and monitoring response to therapy of musculoskeletal tumors.
Peterson JJ
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2007 Sep; 11(3):246-60. PubMed ID: 18260035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18fluoro-deoxyglucose in the detection of local recurrence and distant metastases of pediatric sarcoma.
Arush MW; Israel O; Postovsky S; Militianu D; Meller I; Zaidman I; Sapir AE; Bar-Shalom R
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2007 Dec; 49(7):901-5. PubMed ID: 17252575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is methylene diphosphonate bone scan necessary for initial staging of Ewing sarcoma if 18F-FDG PET/CT is performed?
Ulaner GA; Magnan H; Healey JH; Weber WA; Meyers PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Apr; 202(4):859-67. PubMed ID: 24660717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in the evaluation of sarcomas: A systematic review.
Lim HJ; Johnny Ong CA; Tan JW; Ching Teo MC
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2019 Nov; 143():1-13. PubMed ID: 31449981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI compared to MRI alone for identification of local recurrences of soft tissue sarcomas: a comparison trial.
Erfanian Y; Grueneisen J; Kirchner J; Wetter A; Podleska LE; Bauer S; Poeppel T; Forsting M; Herrmann K; Umutlu L
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Oct; 44(11):1823-1831. PubMed ID: 28567495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of FDG positron emission tomography in conjunction with MR imaging for evaluating therapy response in patients with musculoskeletal sarcomas.
Bredella MA; Caputo GR; Steinbach LS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1145-50. PubMed ID: 12388489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
