These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2795298)
1. A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis. Matteson SR; Bechtold W; Phillips C; Staab EV J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1989 Oct; 47(10):1053-61. PubMed ID: 2795298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms. Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method. Olmez H; Gorgulu S; Akin E; Bengi AO; Tekdemir I; Ors F Angle Orthod; 2011 May; 81(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 21261485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new method for assessment of craniofacial malformations. Pelo S; Tassiello S; Boniello R; Gasparini G; Longobardi G J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Nov; 17(6):1035-9. PubMed ID: 17119401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application and comparison of techniques for three-dimensional analysis of craniofacial anomalies. Abbott AH; Netherway DJ; David DJ; Brown T J Craniofac Surg; 1990 Jul; 1(3):119-34. PubMed ID: 2098169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of CT scanograms and cephalometric radiographs in craniofacial imaging. Chidiac JJ; Shofer FS; Al-Kutoub A; Laster LL; Ghafari J Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 May; 5(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 12086325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography. Farronato G; Garagiola U; Dominici A; Periti G; de Nardi S; Carletti V; Farronato D Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 20529623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry. Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-assisted location of reference points in three dimensions for radiographic cephalometry. Brown T; Abbott AH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Jun; 95(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 2658545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro. Olszewski R; Zech F; Cosnard G; Nicolas V; Macq B; Reychler H Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 36(9):828-33. PubMed ID: 17825530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D CT-based cephalometric analysis: 3D cephalometric theoretical concept and software. Olszewski R; Cosnard G; Macq B; Mahy P; Reychler H Neuroradiology; 2006 Nov; 48(11):853-62. PubMed ID: 17009024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional architectural and structural analysis--a transition in concept and design from Delaire's cephalometric analysis. Lee SH; Kil TJ; Park KR; Kim BC; Kim JG; Piao Z; Corre P Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 43(9):1154-60. PubMed ID: 24794759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses. Papadopoulos MA; Jannowitz C; Boettcher P; Henke J; Stolla R; Zeilhofer HF; Kovacs L; Erhardt W; Biemer E; Papadopulos NA J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15978824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph. Olszewski R; Reychler H; Cosnard G; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Zech F Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 18606747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]