These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27956016)
1. Low-cost GICs reduce survival rate in occlusal ART restorations in primary molars after one year: A RCT. Olegário IC; Pacheco AL; de Araújo MP; Ladewig NM; Bonifácio CC; Imparato JC; Raggio DP J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():45-50. PubMed ID: 27956016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is it worth using low-cost glass ionomer cements for occlusal ART restorations in primary molars? 2-year survival and cost analysis of a Randomized clinical trial. Olegário IC; Ladewig NM; Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Imparato JCP; Mendes FM; Raggio DP J Dent; 2020 Oct; 101():103446. PubMed ID: 32758684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT. Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT. Anna Luisa de Brito P; Isabel Cristina O; Clarissa Calil B; Ana Flávia Bissoto C; José Carlos Pettorossi I; Daniela Prócida R Braz Oral Res; 2017 Nov; 31():e88. PubMed ID: 29116299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial. Garbim JR; Saihara CS; Olegário IC; Hesse D; Araujo MP; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Raggio DP BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 38824540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Olegário IC; Hesse D; Mendes FM; Bonifácio CC; Raggio DP Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 30171345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations. Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Raggio DP; Bönecker M; van Loveren C; van Amerongen WE Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jul; 23(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 22891625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT. Oliveira RC; Camargo LB; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Olegário IC; Gimenez T; Pássaro AL; Tedesco TK; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):371. PubMed ID: 34301217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Hesse D; de Araujo MP; Olegário IC; Innes N; Raggio DP; Bonifácio CC Trials; 2016 Mar; 17():169. PubMed ID: 27029801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results. Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Giomer composite compared to glass ionomer in occlusoproximal ART restorations of primary molars: 24-month RCT. Pássaro AL; Olegário IC; Laux CM; Oliveira RC; Tedesco TK; Raggio DP Aust Dent J; 2022 Jun; 67(2):148-158. PubMed ID: 34904247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilayer technique and nano-filled coating increase success of approximal ART restorations: a randomized clinical trial. Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Guglielmi Cde A; Bönecker M; van Amerongen WE; Raggio DP Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 May; 26(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 26370224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial. Phonghanyudh A; Phantumvanit P; Songpaisan Y; Petersen PE Community Dent Health; 2012 Jun; 29(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 22779380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years. Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial. Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Guglielmi Cde A; Franca Cd; Mendes FM; Raggio DP Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26039906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival Rate of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) Restorations Using a Glass Ionomer Bilayer Technique with a Nanofilled Coating: A Bi-center Randomized Clinical Trial. Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Bönecker M; Guglielmi Cde A; da Franca C; van Amerongen WE; Colares V; Raggio DP Pediatr Dent; 2016; 38(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 26892210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner. Yassen G J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study. Hübel S; Mejàre I Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years. Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya GN Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2010 Jun; 11(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 20507811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]