These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27956045)

  • 1. Biomechanical properties of early keratoconus: Suppressed deformation signal wave.
    Hashemi H; Beiranvand A; Yekta A; Asharlous A; Khabazkhoob M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Apr; 40(2):104-108. PubMed ID: 27956045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining ocular response analyzer metrics for corneal biomechanical diagnosis.
    Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Delrivo M; Bonthoux FF; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 29(9):596-602. PubMed ID: 23848186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Fontes B; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 164():14-21. PubMed ID: 26743618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Second-generation corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in normal, forme fruste keratoconic, and manifest keratoconic corneas after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors.
    Zhang L; Danesh J; Tannan A; Phan V; Yu F; Hamilton DR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2196-204. PubMed ID: 26703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of cornea in topographically normal relatives of patients with keratoconus.
    Kara N; Altinkaynak H; Baz O; Goker Y
    Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 22677642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Jardim D; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 20138369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy and keratoconic eyes using dynamic bidirectional applanation device and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.
    Herber R; Ramm L; Spoerl E; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Terai N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 45(6):778-788. PubMed ID: 30902432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor.
    Galletti JG; Pförtner T; Bonthoux FF
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 22230059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ORA waveform-derived biomechanical parameters to distinguish normal from keratoconic eyes.
    Luz A; Fontes BM; Lopes B; Ramos I; Schor P; Ambrósio R
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2013; 76(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 23828472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
    Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced Combined Tomography and Biomechanics Data for Distinguishing Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Ramos I; Faria-Correia F; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Jul; 32(7):479-94. PubMed ID: 27400080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal biomechanical evaluation in healthy thin corneas compared with matched keratoconus cases.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2011; 74(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 21670900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship of Structural Characteristics to Biomechanical Profile in Normal, Keratoconic, and Crosslinked Eyes.
    Viswanathan D; Kumar NL; Males JJ; Graham SL
    Cornea; 2015 Jul; 34(7):791-6. PubMed ID: 25850703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes of corneal biomechanics with keratoconus.
    Wolffsohn JS; Safeen S; Shah S; Laiquzzaman M
    Cornea; 2012 Aug; 31(8):849-54. PubMed ID: 22495031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discriminant value of custom ocular response analyzer waveform derivatives in keratoconus.
    Hallahan KM; Sinha Roy A; Ambrosio R; Salomao M; Dupps WJ
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Feb; 121(2):459-68. PubMed ID: 24289916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corneal Biomechanics in Unilateral Keratoconus and Fellow Eyes with a Scheimpflug-based Tonometer.
    Catalán-López S; Cadarso-Suárez L; López-Ratón M; Cadarso-Suárez C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Jul; 95(7):608-615. PubMed ID: 29957740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer: curve analysis.
    Touboul D; Bénard A; Mahmoud AM; Gallois A; Colin J; Roberts CJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2144-50. PubMed ID: 21978610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal biomechanical properties and anterior segment parameters in forme fruste keratoconus.
    Kozobolis V; Sideroudi H; Giarmoukakis A; Gkika M; Labiris G
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(6):920-30. PubMed ID: 22865401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes.
    Saad A; Lteif Y; Azan E; Gatinel D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):2912-6. PubMed ID: 20042662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index.
    Vinciguerra R; Ambrósio R; Elsheikh A; Roberts CJ; Lopes B; Morenghi E; Azzolini C; Vinciguerra P
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Dec; 32(12):803-810. PubMed ID: 27930790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.