These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2795618)

  • 1. Laboratory evaluation of face paint repellent formulation using human volunteers under three climatic regimens.
    Gupta RK; Rutledge LC; Frommer RL
    J Med Entomol; 1989 Sep; 26(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 2795618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory evaluation of controlled-release repellent formulations on human volunteers under three climatic regimens.
    Gupta RK; Rutledge LC
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1989 Mar; 5(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 2565368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controlled release repellent formulations on human volunteers under three climatic regimens.
    Gupta RK; Rutledge LC
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1991 Sep; 7(3):490-3. PubMed ID: 1791462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory evaluation of a new repellent camouflage face paint.
    Hoch AL; Gupta RK; Weyandt TB
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1995 Jun; 11(2 Pt 1):172-5. PubMed ID: 7595441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of Advanced Odomos repellent cream (N, N-diethyl-benzamide) against mosquito vectors.
    Mittal PK; Sreehari U; Razdan RK; Dash AP; Ansari MA
    Indian J Med Res; 2011 Apr; 133(4):426-30. PubMed ID: 21537097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repellent and deterrent effects of SS220, Picaridin, and Deet suppress human blood feeding by Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Phlebotomus papatasi.
    Klun JA; Khrimian A; Debboun M
    J Med Entomol; 2006 Jan; 43(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 16506445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repellent effects on Anopheles arabiensis biting humans in Kruger Park, South Africa.
    Govere J; Braack LE; Durrheim DN; Hunt RH; Coetzee M
    Med Vet Entomol; 2001 Sep; 15(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 11583446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory evaluation of 3 repellents against Anopheles stephensi in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
    Vatandoost H; Hanafi-Bojd AA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 18561716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites.
    Fradin MS; Day JF
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Jul; 347(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12097535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of three insect repellents against the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis.
    Govere J; Durrheim DN; Baker L; Hunt R; Coetzee M
    Med Vet Entomol; 2000 Dec; 14(4):441-4. PubMed ID: 11129710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of effectiveness of several repellents against mosquito bites available at the Polish market].
    Mikulak E; Gliniewicz A; Królasik A; Sawicka B; Rabczenko D
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2012; 66(3):479-85. PubMed ID: 23230720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synthesis and repellent efficacy of a new chiral piperidine analog: comparison with Deet and Bayrepel activity in human-volunteer laboratory assays against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi.
    Klun JA; Khrimian A; Margaryan A; Kramer M; Debboun M
    J Med Entomol; 2003 May; 40(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 12943107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field-user acceptability of new camouflage face paint formulations in the Republic of Korea.
    Debboun M; Burge R; Klun JA; Lee HC; Kim HC; Klein TA
    Mil Med; 2005 Oct; 170(10):831-5. PubMed ID: 16435753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Field evaluation of repellents containing deet and AI3-37220 against Anopheles koliensis in Papua New Guinea.
    Frances SP; Cooper RD; Popat S; Beebe NW
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2001 Mar; 17(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 11345417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gender-related efficacy difference to an extended duration formulation of topical N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET).
    Golenda CF; Solberg VB; Burge R; Gambel JM; Wirtz RA
    Am J Trop Med Hyg; 1999 Apr; 60(4):654-7. PubMed ID: 10348243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repellency of two controlled-release formulations of deet against Anopheles quadrimaculatus and Aedes taeniorhynchus mosquitoes.
    Schreck CE; Kline DL
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1989 Mar; 5(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 2708995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of citronella preparations in preventing mosquito bites: systematic review of controlled laboratory experimental studies.
    Kongkaew C; Sakunrag I; Chaiyakunapruk N; Tawatsin A
    Trop Med Int Health; 2011 Jul; 16(7):802-10. PubMed ID: 21481108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy assessment of Quwenling, a mosquito repellent from China.
    Schreck CE; Leonhardt BA
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1991 Sep; 7(3):433-6. PubMed ID: 1791453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the Americas: results of two field trials in Guatemala and Peru.
    Moore SJ; Darling ST; Sihuincha M; Padilla N; Devine GJ
    Malar J; 2007 Aug; 6():101. PubMed ID: 17678537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are mosquitoes diverted from repellent-using individuals to non-users? Results of a field study in Bolivia.
    Moore SJ; Davies CR; Hill N; Cameron MM
    Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Apr; 12(4):532-9. PubMed ID: 17445144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.