296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27956352)
1. Correlation between the frequency difference limen and an index based on principal component analysis of the frequency-following response of normal hearing listeners.
Zhang X; Gong Q
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():255-264. PubMed ID: 27956352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences between auditory frequency-following responses and onset responses: Intracranial evidence from rat inferior colliculus.
Wang Q; Li L
Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 357():25-32. PubMed ID: 29156225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneously-evoked auditory potentials (SEAP): A new method for concurrent measurement of cortical and subcortical auditory-evoked activity.
Slugocki C; Bosnyak D; Trainor LJ
Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():30-42. PubMed ID: 28043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.
Krishnan A; Bidelman GM; Gandour JT
Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):60-6. PubMed ID: 20457239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
Tichko P; Skoe E
Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design and implementation of frequency-following response recording system.
Gong Q; Xu Q; Sun W
Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):824-31. PubMed ID: 24059595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subcortical neural synchrony and absolute thresholds predict frequency discrimination independently.
Marmel F; Linley D; Carlyon RP; Gockel HE; Hopkins K; Plack CJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 14(5):757-66. PubMed ID: 23760984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
Bidelman G; Powers L
Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
Bidelman GM
Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dichotic phase effects on frequency following responses reveal phase variant and invariant harmonic distortion products.
Gnanateja GN; Maruthy S
Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():84-99. PubMed ID: 31212114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aging effects on the neural representation and perception of consonant transition cues.
Poe AA; Karawani H; Anderson S
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109034. PubMed ID: 38781768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
Bidelman GM
Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings.
Clinard CG; Tremblay KL; Krishnan AR
Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 264(1-2):48-55. PubMed ID: 19944140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A; Bartlett E
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e91-e103. PubMed ID: 26583482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones.
Smalt CJ; Krishnan A; Bidelman GM; Ananthakrishnan S; Gandour JT
Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 292(1-2):26-34. PubMed ID: 22910032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of two algorithms for detecting human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Lin CY; Lin CD; Wang CY; Chung HK; Li X
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21047294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency difference beyond behavioral limen reflected by frequency following response of human auditory Brainstem.
Xu Q; Gong Q
Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Aug; 13():114. PubMed ID: 25108552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) represent neural cues relevant to pitch perception.
Xiaochen Zhang ; Qin Gong ; Tao Zhang
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1628-1631. PubMed ID: 28268641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neural representations of concurrent sounds with overlapping spectra in rat inferior colliculus: Comparisons between temporal-fine structure and envelope.
Luo L; Wang Q; Li L
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():87-96. PubMed ID: 28655419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
