These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27958693)

  • 1. CT myocardial perfusion: state of the science.
    Caruso D; DE Santis D; Schoepf UJ; Zerunian M; Eid M; Varga-Szemes A; Tesche C; Duguay TM; Laghi A; DE Cecco CN
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2017 Jun; 65(3):252-264. PubMed ID: 27958693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Caruso D; Eid M; Schoepf UJ; Jin KN; Varga-Szemes A; Tesche C; Mangold S; Spandorfer A; Laghi A; De Cecco CN
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1893-1899. PubMed ID: 27510361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT myocardial perfusion and coronary CT angiography: Influence of coronary calcium on a stress-rest protocol.
    Ladeiras-Lopes R; Bettencourt N; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Gama V
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 26869367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Hulten E; Ahmadi A; Blankstein R
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):623-31. PubMed ID: 25770850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT Coronary Angiography and Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion for Detection of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.
    Ahn Y; Koo HJ; Hyun J; Lee SE; Jung SH; Park DW; Ahn JM; Kang DY; Park SJ; Hwang HS; Kang JW; Yang DH; Kim JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Jul; 16(7):934-947. PubMed ID: 37407125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Performance of First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Imaging without Stress with Computed Tomography (CT) Compared with Coronary CT Angiography Alone, with Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
    Osawa K; Miyoshi T; Miki T; Koyama Y; Sato S; Kanazawa S; Ito H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149170. PubMed ID: 26894686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical prerequisites and imaging protocols for dynamic and dual energy myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Cannaò PM; Schoepf UJ; Muscogiuri G; Wichmann JL; Fuller SR; Secchi F; Varga-Szemes A; De Cecco CN
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2401-10. PubMed ID: 25779223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SPECT/PET myocardial perfusion imaging versus coronary CT angiography in patients with known or suspected CAD.
    Berman DS; Shaw LJ; Min JK; Hachamovitch R; Abidov A; Germano G; Hayes SW; Friedman JD; Thomson LE; Kang X; Slomka P; Rozanski A
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Apr; 54(2):177-200. PubMed ID: 20592682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Additional diagnostic value of integrated analysis of cardiac CTA and SPECT MPI using the SMARTVis system in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Kirişli HA; Gupta V; Shahzad R; Al Younis I; Dharampal A; Geuns RJ; Scholte AJ; de Graaf MA; Joemai RM; Nieman K; van Vliet L; van Walsum T; Lelieveldt B; Niessen WJ
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Jan; 55(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 24337600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Financial and clinical outcomes of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary CT angiography-guided versus coronary CT angiography-guided strategy.
    Dai X; Lan Z; Ling R; Yu Y; Yu L; Lu Z; Shen C; Kitagawa K; Li Y; Yang W; Zhang J
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; 33(11):8191-8202. PubMed ID: 37286790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study.
    Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incremental diagnostic accuracy of hybrid SPECT/CT coronary angiography in a population with an intermediate to high pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease.
    Schaap J; Kauling RM; Boekholdt SM; Nieman K; Meijboom WB; Post MC; Van der Heyden JA; de Kroon TL; van Es HW; Rensing BJ; Verzijlbergen JF
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jul; 14(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 23291392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-detector cardiac computed tomography compared with stress nuclear imaging in patients undergoing invasive cardiac catheterization.
    Hamirani YS; Isma'eel H; Larijani V; Drury P; Lim W; Bevinal M; Saeed A; Ahmadi N; Karlsberg RP; Budoff MJ
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(5):645-51. PubMed ID: 20861764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional Information in Coronary Artery Disease: The Case of Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion.
    Kofoed KF; Sørgaard MH; Linde JJ
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2017 Oct; 19(12):126. PubMed ID: 29071430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional compared to anatomical imaging in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease: An international, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (IAEA-SPECT/CTA study).
    Karthikeyan G; Guzic Salobir B; Jug B; Devasenapathy N; Alexanderson E; Vitola J; Kraft O; Ozkan E; Sharma S; Purohit G; Dolenc Novak M; Meave A; Trevethan S; Cerci R; Zier S; Gotthardtová L; Jonszta T; Altin T; Soydal C; Patel C; Gulati G; Paez D; Dondi M; Kashyap R
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 24(2):507-517. PubMed ID: 27796852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Additional diagnostic value of first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging without stress when combined with 64-row detector coronary CT angiography in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Osawa K; Miyoshi T; Koyama Y; Hashimoto K; Sato S; Nakamura K; Nishii N; Kohno K; Morita H; Kanazawa S; Ito H
    Heart; 2014 Jul; 100(13):1008-15. PubMed ID: 24763490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
    Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Outcomes of Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Combined With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Guided Strategy.
    Yu M; Shen C; Dai X; Lu Z; Wang Y; Lu B; Zhang J
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 13(1):e009775. PubMed ID: 31910669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Underestimation of myocardial blood flow by dynamic perfusion CT: Explanations by two-compartment model analysis and limited temporal sampling of dynamic CT.
    Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Ichihara T; Natsume T; Nakayama R; Nagasawa N; Kubooka M; Ito T; Uno M; Goto Y; Nagata M; Sakuma H
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 26851149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absolute Versus Relative Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Anatomic Coronary Artery Disease.
    Wichmann JL; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ; Lo GG; Choe YH; Wang Y; Vliegenthart R; Varga-Szemes A; Muscogiuri G; Cannaò PM; De Cecco CN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):W67-72. PubMed ID: 26102420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.