These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27959639)

  • 21. Spider dragline silk: correlated and mosaic evolution in high-performance biological materials.
    Swanson BO; Blackledge TA; Summers AP; Hayashi CY
    Evolution; 2006 Dec; 60(12):2539-51. PubMed ID: 17263115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanical properties of spider dragline silk: humidity, hysteresis, and relaxation.
    Vehoff T; Glisović A; Schollmeyer H; Zippelius A; Salditt T
    Biophys J; 2007 Dec; 93(12):4425-32. PubMed ID: 17766337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The hidden link between supercontraction and mechanical behavior of spider silks.
    Elices M; Plaza GR; Pérez-Rigueiro J; Guinea GV
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Jul; 4(5):658-69. PubMed ID: 21565714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spider silk: understanding the structure-function relationship of a natural fiber.
    Humenik M; Scheibel T; Smith A
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2011; 103():131-85. PubMed ID: 21999996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Supercontraction of dragline silk spun by lynx spiders (Oxyopidae).
    Pérez-Rigueiro J; Plaza GR; Torres FG; Hijar A; Hayashi C; Perea GB; Elices M; Guinea GV
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2010 Jun; 46(5):555-7. PubMed ID: 20359492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Correlation between protein secondary structure and mechanical performance for the ultra-tough dragline silk of Darwin's bark spider.
    Htut KZ; Alicea-Serrano AM; Singla S; Agnarsson I; Garb JE; Kuntner M; Gregorič M; Haney RA; Marhabaie M; Blackledge TA; Dhinojwala A
    J R Soc Interface; 2021 Jun; 18(179):20210320. PubMed ID: 34129788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nanostructural and mechanical property changes to spider silk as a consequence of insecticide exposure.
    Benamú M; Lacava M; García LF; Santana M; Fang J; Wang X; Blamires SJ
    Chemosphere; 2017 Aug; 181():241-249. PubMed ID: 28445817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reproducibility of the tensile properties of spider (Argiope trifasciata) silk obtained by forced silking.
    Guinea GV; Elices M; Real JI; Gutiérrez S; Pérez-Rigueiro J
    J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol; 2005 Jan; 303(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 15612009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consequences of forced silking.
    Ortlepp CS; Gosline JM
    Biomacromolecules; 2004; 5(3):727-31. PubMed ID: 15132653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of spinning forces on spider silk properties.
    Pérez-Rigueiro J; Elices M; Plaza G; Real JI; Guinea GV
    J Exp Biol; 2005 Jul; 208(Pt 14):2633-9. PubMed ID: 16000533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Structure-function-property-design interplay in biopolymers: spider silk.
    Tokareva O; Jacobsen M; Buehler M; Wong J; Kaplan DL
    Acta Biomater; 2014 Apr; 10(4):1612-26. PubMed ID: 23962644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spider silk as a load bearing biomaterial: tailoring mechanical properties via structural modifications.
    Brown CP; Rosei F; Traversa E; Licoccia S
    Nanoscale; 2011 Mar; 3(3):870-6. PubMed ID: 21212901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Supercontraction stress in spider webs.
    Savage KN; Guerette PA; Gosline JM
    Biomacromolecules; 2004; 5(3):675-9. PubMed ID: 15132646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multiscale mechanisms of nutritionally induced property variation in spider silks.
    Blamires SJ; Nobbs M; Martens PJ; Tso IM; Chuang WT; Chang CK; Sheu HS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192005. PubMed ID: 29390013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Web building and silk properties functionally covary among species of wolf spider.
    Lacava M; Camargo A; Garcia LF; Benamú MA; Santana M; Fang J; Wang X; Blamires SJ
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Jul; 31(7):968-978. PubMed ID: 29658162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Silk physico-chemical variability and mechanical robustness facilitates intercontinental invasibility of a spider.
    Viera C; Garcia LF; Lacava M; Fang J; Wang X; Kasumovic MM; Blamires SJ
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13273. PubMed ID: 31519928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identification of Wet-Spinning and Post-Spin Stretching Methods Amenable to Recombinant Spider Aciniform Silk.
    Weatherbee-Martin N; Xu L; Hupe A; Kreplak L; Fudge DS; Liu XQ; Rainey JK
    Biomacromolecules; 2016 Aug; 17(8):2737-46. PubMed ID: 27387592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Molecular and nanostructural mechanisms of deformation, strength and toughness of spider silk fibrils.
    Nova A; Keten S; Pugno NM; Redaelli A; Buehler MJ
    Nano Lett; 2010 Jul; 10(7):2626-34. PubMed ID: 20518518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mechanical behavior of silk during the evolution of orb-web spinning spiders.
    Elices M; Plaza GR; Arnedo MA; Pérez-Rigueiro J; Torres FG; Guinea GV
    Biomacromolecules; 2009 Jul; 10(7):1904-10. PubMed ID: 19505138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Invited review current progress and limitations of spider silk for biomedical applications.
    Widhe M; Johansson J; Hedhammar M; Rising A
    Biopolymers; 2012 Jun; 97(6):468-78. PubMed ID: 21898363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.