BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27959780)

  • 21. Comparison of anidulafungin MICs determined by the clinical and laboratory standards institute broth microdilution method (M27-A3 document) and Etest for Candida species isolates.
    Espinel-Ingroff A; Canton E; Peman J; Martín-Mazuelo E
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2010 Mar; 54(3):1347-50. PubMed ID: 20028814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Etest ECVs/ECOFFs for Detection of Resistance in Prevalent and Three Nonprevalent
    Espinel-Ingroff A; Sasso M; Turnidge J; Arendrup M; Botterel F; Bourgeois N; Bouteille B; Canton E; Cassaing S; Dannaoui E; Dehais M; Delhaes L; Dupont D; Fekkar A; Fuller J; Garcia-Effron G; Garcia J; Gonzalez GM; Govender NP; Guegan H; Guinea J; Houzé S; Lass-Flörl C; Pelaez T; Forastiero A; Lackner M; Magobo R
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2021 Oct; 65(11):e0109321. PubMed ID: 34370582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Neonatal Candida infections and the antifungal susceptibilities of the related Candida species].
    Altuncu E; Bilgen H; Cerikçioğlu N; Ilki A; Ulger N; Bakır M; Akman I; Ozek E
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2010 Oct; 44(4):593-603. PubMed ID: 21063972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interlaboratory reproducibility of Etest amphotericin B and caspofungin yeast susceptibility testing and comparison with the CLSI method.
    Ranque S; Lachaud L; Gari-Toussaint M; Michel-Nguyen A; Mallié M; Gaudart J; Bertout S
    J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 50(7):2305-9. PubMed ID: 22553230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Release of different amphotericin B formulations from PMMA bone cements and their activity against Candida biofilm.
    Czuban M; Wulsten D; Wang L; Di Luca M; Trampuz A
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2019 Nov; 183():110406. PubMed ID: 31401462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multi-centre evaluation of the Etest method for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans. BSAC Working Party on Antifungal Chemotherapy.
    Warnock DW; Johnson EM; Rogers TR
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1998 Sep; 42(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 9786472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of Etest and disk diffusion methods compared with broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Candida spp. against posaconazole.
    Diekema DJ; Messer SA; Hollis RJ; Boyken LB; Tendolkar S; Kroeger J; Pfaller MA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 45(6):1974-7. PubMed ID: 17301284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Biofilm production and antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida species].
    Yücesoy M; Karaman M
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2004; 38(1-2):91-8. PubMed ID: 15293907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Antifungal Activity of Chitosan-Coated Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) Acid Nanoparticles Containing Amphotericin B.
    Ludwig DB; de Camargo LEA; Khalil NM; Auler ME; Mainardes RM
    Mycopathologia; 2018 Aug; 183(4):659-668. PubMed ID: 29497926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Molecular epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from urine samples of patients in intensive care unit].
    Yüksekkaya S; Fındık D; Arslan U
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):137-49. PubMed ID: 21341168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative in vitro effects of liposomal amphotericin B, amphotericin B-deoxycholate, and free amphotericin B against fungal strains determined by using MIC and minimal lethal concentration susceptibility studies and time-kill curves.
    Ralph ED; Khazindar AM; Barber KR; Grant CW
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1991 Jan; 35(1):188-91. PubMed ID: 2014976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) broth microdilution methods for determining the susceptibilities of Candida isolates].
    Dalyan Cilo B; Topaç T; Ağca H; Sağlam S; Efe K; Ener B
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2018 Jan; 52(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 29642828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Etest and a tablet diffusion test with the NCCLS broth microdilution method for fluconazole and amphotericin B susceptibility testing of Candida isolates.
    Arendrup M; Lundgren B; Jensen IM; Hansen BS; Frimodt-Møller N
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2001 May; 47(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 11328761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro antifungal activity of Indian liposomal amphotericin B against clinical isolates of emerging species of yeast and moulds, and its comparison with amphotericin B deoxycholate, voriconazole, itraconazole and fluconazole.
    Rudramurthy SM; Jatana M; Singh R; Chakrabarti A
    Mycoses; 2013 Jan; 56(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 22519679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Correlation between Etest, disk diffusion, and microdilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida species from infection and colonization.
    Negri M; Henriques M; Svidzinski TI; Paula CR; Oliveira R
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2009; 23(5):324-30. PubMed ID: 19785043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identification and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from bloodstream infections in Konya, Turkey.
    Dagi HT; Findik D; Senkeles C; Arslan U
    Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2016 May; 15(1):36. PubMed ID: 27245756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patterns of amphotericin B killing kinetics against seven Candida species.
    Cantón E; Pemán J; Gobernado M; Viudes A; Espinel-Ingroff A
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2004 Jul; 48(7):2477-82. PubMed ID: 15215097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Comparison of microdilution and disk diffusion methods for the detection of fluconazole and voriconazole susceptibility against clinical Candida glabrata isolates and determination of changing susceptibility with new CLSI breakpoints].
    Hazırolan G; Sarıbaş Z; Arıkan Akdağlı S
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2016 Jul; 50(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 27525398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative in vitro antifungal susceptibility activity of amphotericin B versus amphotericin B methyl ester against Candida albicans ocular isolates.
    Thanathanee O; Miller D; Ringel DM; Schaffner CP; Alfonso EC; O'Brien TP
    J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Dec; 28(6):589-92. PubMed ID: 22788845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the etest method using Mueller-Hinton agar with glucose and methylene blue for determining amphotericin B MICs for 4,936 clinical isolates of Candida species.
    Pfaller MA; Boyken L; Messer SA; Tendolkar S; Hollis RJ; Diekema DJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Nov; 42(11):4977-9. PubMed ID: 15528683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.