These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27960006)

  • 1. Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Dorman MF; Liss J; Wang S; Berisha V; Ludwig C; Natale SC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 59(6):1505-1519. PubMed ID: 27960006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validating a Method to Assess Lipreading, Audiovisual Gain, and Integration During Speech Reception With Cochlear-Implanted and Normal-Hearing Subjects Using a Talking Head.
    Schreitmüller S; Frenken M; Bentz L; Ortmann M; Walger M; Meister H
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):503-516. PubMed ID: 29068860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences.
    Grant KW; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1197-208. PubMed ID: 11008820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
    Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concurrent-vowel and tone recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Fu QJ; Wu HP; Hsu CJ
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):75-84. PubMed ID: 19595753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A single-band envelope cue as a supplement to speechreading of segmentals: a comparison of auditory versus tactual presentation.
    Bratakos MS; Reed CM; Delhorne LA; Denesvich G
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 11409858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech Recognition and Cognitive Skills in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Hua H; Johansson B; Magnusson L; Lyxell B; Ellis RJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 60(9):2752-2763. PubMed ID: 28885638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
    Yang HI; Zeng FG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults.
    Sommers MS; Tye-Murray N; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 15937408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of list equivalency for Mandarin speech materials to use with cochlear implant listeners.
    Li Y; Wang S; Su Q; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S31-S40. PubMed ID: 27414242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making Sense of Sentences: Top-Down Processing of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Moberly AC; Reed J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 62(8):2895-2905. PubMed ID: 31330118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory Discrimination of Lexical Stress Patterns in Hearing-Impaired Infants with Cochlear Implants Compared with Normal Hearing: Influence of Acoustic Cues and Listening Experience to the Ambient Language.
    Segal O; Houston D; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 26627470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.