BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2796029)

  • 1. Bilateral waveform dissimilarity of auditory evoked potentials may reveal a lateralized motor response process: a correlation method.
    Ninomiya H; Ikeda T
    Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol; 1989 Jun; 43(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 2796029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural processing in a three-choice reaction-time task: a study using cerebral evoked-potentials and single-trial analysis in normal humans.
    Ortiz TA; Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 69(5):1499-512. PubMed ID: 8509828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensory discrimination and its relationship to the cerebral processing of infrequent stimuli.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Mantle MM
    Can J Neurol Sci; 1987 Nov; 14(4):642-8. PubMed ID: 3690439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is there a generalized right hemisphere dominance for mediating cerebral activation? Evidence from a choice reaction experiment with lateralized simple warning stimuli.
    Sturm W; Reul J; Willmes K
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(5):747-51. PubMed ID: 2739898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Event-related brain potentials and attention during simultaneous performance of two tasks.
    Sullivan C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Oct; 83(2):651-7. PubMed ID: 8902045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response mode and P300 from auditory stimuli.
    Polich J
    Biol Psychol; 1987 Aug; 25(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 3447637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consciousness of attention and expectancy as reflected in event-related potentials and reaction times.
    Sommer W; Matt J; Leuthold H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Sep; 16(5):902-15. PubMed ID: 2147445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. P300, habituation, and response mode.
    Lew GS; Polich J
    Physiol Behav; 1993 Jan; 53(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 8434050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Late components of auditory event-related potentials to eight equiprobable stimuli in a target detection task.
    McCallum WC; Barrett K; Pocock PV
    Psychophysiology; 1989 Nov; 26(6):683-94. PubMed ID: 2629016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. N2 event-related potential correlates of response inhibition in an auditory Go/Nogo task.
    Kaiser S; Weiss O; Hill H; Markela-Lerenc J; Kiefer M; Weisbrod M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 16298004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event-related potentials to auditory stimuli following transient shifts of spatial attention in a Go/Nogo task.
    Schröger E
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Sep; 36(3):183-207. PubMed ID: 8260565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. P300, clinical symptoms, and neuropsychological parameters in acute and remitted schizophrenia: a preliminary report.
    Eikmeier G; Lodemann E; Zerbin D; Gastpar M
    Biol Psychiatry; 1992 May; 31(10):1065-9. PubMed ID: 1511077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensory and movement-related cortical potentials in nociceptive and auditory reaction time tasks.
    Tarkka IM; Treede RD; Bromm B
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1992 Oct; 86(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 1455981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The temporal selectivity of additive factor effects on the reaction process revealed in ERP component latencies.
    Smulders FT; Kok A; Kenemans JL; Bashore TR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Nov; 90(1-3):97-109. PubMed ID: 8525879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correspondence between brain ERP and behavioral asymmetries in a dichotic complex tone test.
    Tenke CE; Bruder GE; Towey JP; Leite P; Sidtis JJ
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Jan; 30(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 8416063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonprimary auditory thalamic representation of acoustic change.
    Kraus N; McGee T; Littman T; Nicol T; King C
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Sep; 72(3):1270-7. PubMed ID: 7807210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory stimulus processing at different stimulus intensities as reflected by auditory evoked potentials.
    Adler G; Adler J
    Biol Psychiatry; 1991 Feb; 29(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 2036478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of small variation of the frequent auditory stimulus on the event-related brain potential to the infrequent stimulus.
    Winkler I; Paavilainen P; Alho K; Reinikainen K; Sams M; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 1990 Mar; 27(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 2247552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of attention and background verbal stimuli on event-related potentials to tone pips in humans.
    Nakahara D; Ikeda T
    Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol; 1987 Dec; 41(4):699-707. PubMed ID: 3453417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.