These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis in the mitral position: a 10-year follow up of St. Jude Medical and Biocor valves. Demirag M; Kirali K; Omeroglu SN; Mansuroglu D; Akinci E; Ipek G; Berki T; Gürbüz A; Isik O; Yakut C J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11206772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982). Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Surgical results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valves]. Saigenji H; Toyohira H; Shimokawa S; Moriyama Y; Watanabe S; Koga M; Toda R; Yamashita T; Yamaoka A; Taira A Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 May; 44(5):641-5. PubMed ID: 8964993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term comparative analysis of the Björk-Shiley and Hancock valves implanted in 1975. Martinell J; Fraile J; Artiz V; Moreno J; Rábago G J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):741-9. PubMed ID: 4058046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up. Hammond GL; Geha AS; Kopf GS; Hashim SW J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early and late results with combined mitral and aortic valve replacement. Matsuyoshi T; Kimura M; Tachikawa Y; Nakamura M; Iwakuma A; Morishige N; Nakamura K; Sukehiro S; Kawano Y; Anai K Igaku Kenkyu; 1993 Sep; 63(3):85-94. PubMed ID: 8023654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H; Rudolph W Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Long-term results of mechanical valves in aortic position and biological valves in mitral and tricuspid positions]. Shimoyama Y; Wanibuchi Y; Ino T; Terada Y; Takagi H; Furuta S Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1529-33. PubMed ID: 2586459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A 5 1/2 year experience with the St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prosthesis. Early and late results of 737 valve replacements in 671 patients. Baudet EM; Oca CC; Roques XF; Laborde MN; Hafez AS; Collot MA; Ghidoni IM J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Jul; 90(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 3874324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the Ionescu-Schiley pericardial xenograft and the Braunwald-Cutter and Björk-Shiley prostheses in the mitral position. Tandon AP; Sengupta SM; Lukacs L; Ionescu MI J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Dec; 76(6):763-70. PubMed ID: 713583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion. Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis. David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mitral valve replacement with Hancock porcine bioprostheses: up to 7-year follow-up. Brais MP; Bédard JP; Goldstein W; Koshal A; Keon WJ Can J Surg; 1985 Mar; 28(2):119-21, 123. PubMed ID: 3971234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]